# RevisEval: Improving LLM-as-a-Judge via Response-Adapted References

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05193 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05193/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 49 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 49)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04475/) (2024)
- [ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15056/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08491/) (2023)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01535/) (2024)
- [MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02622/) (2019)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10669/) (2024)
- [PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05087/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07641/) (2023)
- [RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08726/) (2022)
- [Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06774/) (2022)
- [USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00456/) (2020)
- [Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05470/) (2023)
- [BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06063/) (2020)
- [RL4F: Generating Natural Language Feedback with Reinforcement Learning for Repairing Model Outputs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08844/) (2023)
- [A Confederacy of Models: a Comprehensive Evaluation of LLMs on Creative Writing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08433/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24235/) (2025)
- [Learning to Plan & Reason for Evaluation with Thinking-LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18099/) (2025)
- [No Free Labels: Limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge Without Human Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05061/) (2025)
- [Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.15722/) (2025)
- [BizFinBench: A Business-Driven Real-World Financial Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19457/) (2025)
- [ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20973/) (2025)
- [Rethinking LLM-as-a-Judge: Representation-as-a-Judge with Small Language Models via Semantic Capacity Asymmetry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22588/) (2026)
- [Graders should cheat: privileged information enables expert-level automated evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10961/) (2025)
- [HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13031/) (2025)
- [Enterprise Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20274/) (2025)
- [How Real is Your Jailbreak? Fine-grained Jailbreak Evaluation with Anchored Reference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03288/) (2026)
- [Beyond LLM-as-a-Judge: Deterministic Metrics for Multilingual Generative Text Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05083/) (2026)
- [When Vision-Language Models Judge Without Seeing: Exposing Informativeness Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17768/) (2026)
- [References Improve LLM Alignment in Non-Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16802/) (2026)
- [Learning to Align Multi-Faceted Evaluation: A Unified and Robust Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18874/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Effectiveness of Using LLMs for Automated Assessment of Student Self Explanations in Programming Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.21614/) (2026)
- [Prompt Perturbation for Reliable LLM Evaluation over Comparison Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.17634/) (2026)
- [LLM-Based Multi-Reference Evaluation for Efficient and Robust Assessment of Phrase Break Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21098/) (2026)
- [Judges Follow the Reference: The Derivation Gap in Verifying Tool-Call Arguments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18497/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With significant efforts in recent studies, LLM-as-a-Judge has become a cost-effective alternative to human evaluation for assessing text generation quality in a wide range of tasks. However, there still remains a reliability gap between LLM-as-a-Judge and human evaluation. One important reason is the lack of guided oracles in the evaluation process. Motivated by the role of reference pervasively used in classic text evaluation, we introduce RevisEval, a novel text generation evaluation paradigm via the response-adapted references. RevisEval is driven by the key observation that an ideal reference should maintain the necessary relevance to the response to be evaluated. Specifically, RevisEval leverages the text revision capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to adaptively revise the response, then treat the revised text as the reference (response-adapted reference) for the subsequent evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RevisEval outperforms traditional reference-free and reference-based evaluation paradigms that use LLM-as-a-Judge across NLG tasks and open-ended instruction-following tasks. More importantly, our response-adapted references can further boost the classical text metrics, e.g., BLEU and BERTScore, compared to traditional references and even rival the LLM-as-a-Judge. A detailed analysis is also conducted to confirm RevisEval's effectiveness in bias reduction, the impact of inference cost, and reference relevance.