# Best-of-Both-Worlds Policy Optimization for CMDPs with Bandit Feedback

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02269 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02269/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Data-Dependent Regret Bounds for Constrained MABs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20010/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study online learning in constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) in which rewards and constraints may be either stochastic or adversarial. In such settings, Stradi et al.(2024) proposed the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm able to seamlessly handle stochastic and adversarial constraints, achieving optimal regret and constraint violation bounds in both cases. This algorithm suffers from two major drawbacks. First, it only works under full feedback, which severely limits its applicability in practice. Moreover, it relies on optimizing over the space of occupancy measures, which requires solving convex optimization problems, an highly inefficient task. In this paper, we provide the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm for CMDPs with bandit feedback. Specifically, when the constraints are stochastic, the algorithm achieves widetildeO(√T) regret and constraint violation, while, when they are adversarial, it attains widetildeO(√T) constraint violation and a tight fraction of the optimal reward. Moreover, our algorithm is based on a policy optimization approach, which is much more efficient than occupancy-measure-based methods.
