# From Prohibition to Adoption: How Hong Kong Universities Are Navigating ChatGPT in Academic Workflows

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01695 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01695/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.03586/) (2017)
- [A Comprehensive AI Policy Education Framework for University Teaching and Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00280/) (2023)
- [Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13934/) (2024)
- [The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18842/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper aims at comparing the time when Hong Kong universities used to ban ChatGPT to the current periods where it has become integrated in the academic processes. Bolted by concerns of integrity and ethical issues in technologies, institutions have adapted by moving towards the center adopting AI literacy and responsibility policies. This study examines new paradigms which have been developed to help implement these positives while preventing negative effects on academia. Keywords: ChatGPT, Academic Integrity, AI Literacy, Ethical AI Use, Generative AI in Education, University Policy, AI Integration in Academia, Higher Education and Technology