# Seeing Eye to AI: Human Alignment via Gaze-Based Response Rewards for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01532 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01532/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 53 of its 95 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 53)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.14275/) (2022)
- [Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15217/) (2023)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02561/) (2023)
- [RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13787/) (2024)
- [RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05302/) (2023)
- [Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13712/) (2023)
- [UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01377/) (2023)
- [SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10425/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06657/) (2023)
- [HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08673/) (2024)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [Self-Alignment with Instruction Backtranslation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06259/) (2023)
- [HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09528/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [OASST-ETC Dataset: Alignment Signals from Eye-tracking Analysis of LLM Responses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10927/) (2025)
- [Neuro-Cognitive Reward Modeling for Human-Centered Autonomous Vehicle Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25968/) (2026)
- [Integrating Cognitive Processing Signals into Language Models: A Review of Advances, Applications and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06843/) (2025)
- [Gaze Beyond the Frame: Forecasting Egocentric 3D Visual Span](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18470/) (2025)
- [Reflections and New Directions for Human-Centered Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06901/) (2026)
- [Enhancing RLHF with Human Gaze Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09016/) (2025)
- [Gaze patterns predict preference and confidence in pairwise AI image evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24849/) (2026)
- [Decoding Open-Ended Information Seeking Goals from Eye Movements in Reading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02872/) (2025)
- [Plural Voices, Single Agent: Towards Inclusive AI in Multi-User Domestic Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19008/) (2025)
- [Eye-Tracking-while-Reading: A Living Survey of Datasets with Open Library Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19598/) (2026)
- [Your Mouse and Eyes Secretly Leak Your Preference: LLM Alignment using Implicit Feedback from Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20482/) (2026)
- [Learning to Refer from Estimated Listener Gaze](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14207/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP), have led to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT, Llama, Claude, and Gemini, which excel across a range of tasks but require extensive fine-tuning to align their outputs with human expectations. A widely used method for achieving this alignment is Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which, despite its success, faces challenges in accurately modelling human preferences. In this paper, we introduce GazeReward, a novel framework that integrates implicit feedback -- and specifically eye-tracking (ET) data -- into the Reward Model (RM). In addition, we explore how ET-based features can provide insights into user preferences. Through ablation studies we test our framework with different integration methods, LLMs, and ET generator models, demonstrating that our approach significantly improves the accuracy of the RM on established human preference datasets. This work advances the ongoing discussion on optimizing AI alignment with human values, exploring the potential of cognitive data for shaping future NLP research.