# Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01353 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01353/

## Key facts

- Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.04434/) (2024)
- [Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.09938/) (2021)
- [Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04652/) (2024)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03091/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11931/) (2024)
- [CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-X](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17568/) (2023)
- [IntelliCode Compose: Code Generation Using Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.08025/) (2020)
- [CrossCodeEval: A Diverse and Multilingual Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11248/) (2023)
- [ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01861/) (2023)
- [CodeGemma: Open Code Models Based on Gemma](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11409/) (2024)
- [CERT: Continual Pre-Training on Sketches for Library-Oriented Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06888/) (2022)
- [At Which Training Stage Does Code Data Help LLMs Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16298/) (2023)
- [EvoCodeBench: An Evolving Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00599/) (2024)
- [DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19856/) (2024)
- [Alibaba LingmaAgent: Improving Automated Issue Resolution via Comprehensive Repository Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01422/) (2024)
- [xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03004/) (2023)
- [CLIPSyntel: CLIP and LLM Synergy for Multimodal Question Summarization in Healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11541/) (2023)
- [CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08588/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Action: Faithful and Multimodal Question Answering through Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17359/) (2024)
- [Conv-CoA: Improving Open-domain Question Answering in Large Language Models via Conversational Chain-of-Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17822/) (2024)
- [RepoMasterEval: Evaluating Code Completion via Real-World Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03519/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Lingma SWE-GPT: An Open Development-Process-Centric Language Model for Automated Software Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00622/) (2024)
- [FEA-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Repository-Level Code Generation for Feature Implementation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06680/) (2025)
- [MetaSpatial: Reinforcing 3D Spatial Reasoning in VLMs for the Metaverse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18470/) (2025)
- [Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23803/) (2025)
- [From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18538/) (2025)
- [CodeCrash: Exposing LLM Fragility to Misleading Natural Language in Code Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14119/) (2025)
- [LLMs as Continuous Learners: Improving the Reproduction of Defective Code in Software Issues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13941/) (2024)
- [Do Code LLMs Understand Design Patterns?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04835/) (2025)
- [Automatically Benchmarking LLM Code Agents through Agent-Driven Annotation and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24358/) (2025)
- [ClarEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Clarification Skills of Code Agents under Ambiguous Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00187/) (2026)
- [AdvEvo-MARL: Shaping Internalized Safety through Adversarial Co-Evolution in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01586/) (2025)
- [Evo-MARL: Co-Evolutionary Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Internalized Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03864/) (2025)
- [CoreCodeBench: Decoupling Code Intelligence via Fine-Grained Repository-Level Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05281/) (2025)
- [FairReason: Balancing Reasoning and Social Bias in MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23067/) (2025)
- [MetaFind: Scene-Aware 3D Asset Retrieval for Coherent Metaverse Scene Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04057/) (2025)
- [DiffBench Meets DiffAgent: End-to-End LLM-Driven Diffusion Acceleration Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03178/) (2026)
- [Leveraging BART to Assess CS1 C++ Programming Assignments using Rubric-based Criteria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03814/) (2026)
- [What Was Once Learned May Need to Be Unlearned: Machine Unlearning for Deprecated API Knowledge in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25786/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Code completion, a key downstream task in code generation, is one of the most frequent and impactful methods for enhancing developer productivity in software development. As intelligent completion tools evolve, we need a robust evaluation benchmark that enables meaningful comparisons between products and guides future advancements. However, existing benchmarks focus more on coarse-grained tasks without industrial analysis resembling general code generation rather than the real-world scenarios developers encounter. Moreover, these benchmarks often rely on costly and time-consuming human annotation, and the standalone test cases fail to leverage minimal tests for maximum repository-level understanding and code coverage. To address these limitations, we first analyze business data from an industrial code completion tool and redefine the evaluation criteria to better align with the developer's intent and desired completion behavior throughout the coding process. Based on these insights, we introduce Codev-Agent, an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage, ensuring fair and effective comparisons. Using Codev-Agent, we present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Bench assesses whether a code completion tool can capture a developer's immediate intent and suggest appropriate code across diverse contexts, providing a more realistic benchmark for code completion in modern software development.