# Model-Free versus Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Fixed-Wing UAV Attitude Control Under Varying Wind Conditions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17896 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17896/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for robot navigation and UAV control](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-robot-navigation-and-uav-control/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08265/) (2019)
- [Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04104/) (2023)
- [Learning Quadrupedal Locomotion over Challenging Terrain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11251/) (2020)
- [TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16828/) (2023)
- [Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04955/) (2022)
- [Learning Agile Robotic Locomotion Skills by Imitating Animals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00784/) (2020)
- [Model Predictive Path Integral Control using Covariance Variable Importance Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.01149/) (2015)
- [Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05038/) (2021)
- [Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10943/) (2023)
- [Control of a Quadrotor with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.05110/) (2017)
- [Neural Lander: Stable Drone Landing Control using Learned Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08027/) (2018)
- [Regularizing Action Policies for Smooth Control with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06644/) (2020)
- [Reinforcement Learning for UAV Attitude Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04154/) (2018)
- [Is Bang-Bang Control All You Need? Solving Continuous Control with Bernoulli Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02552/) (2021)
- [MoDem-V2: Visuo-Motor World Models for Real-World Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14236/) (2023)
- [Meta-Adaptive Nonlinear Control: Theory and Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06098/) (2021)
- [Learning to Fly via Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08876/) (2020)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning Attitude Control of Fixed-Wing UAVs Using Proximal Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05478/) (2019)
- [Data-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning for Attitude Control of Fixed-Wing UAVs: Field Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04153/) (2021)
- [A Study of State Aliasing in Structured Prediction with RNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.09310/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper evaluates and compares the performance of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning for the attitude control of fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles using PID as a reference point. The comparison focuses on their ability to handle varying flight dynamics and wind disturbances in a simulated environment. Our results show that the Temporal Difference Model Predictive Control agent outperforms both the PID controller and other model-free reinforcement learning methods in terms of tracking accuracy and robustness over different reference difficulties, particularly in nonlinear flight regimes. Furthermore, we introduce actuation fluctuation as a key metric to assess energy efficiency and actuator wear, and we test two different approaches from the literature: action variation penalty and conditioning for action policy smoothness. We also evaluate all control methods when subject to stochastic turbulence and gusts separately, so as to measure their effects on tracking performance, observe their limitations and outline their implications on the Markov decision process formalism.