# Cross-lingual Human-Preference Alignment for Neural Machine Translation with Direct Quality Optimization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17673 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.17673/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 32 of its 74 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [LLM preference optimization methods](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/llm-preference-optimization-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08593/) (2019)
- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [Hierarchical Neural Story Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04833/) (2018)
- [Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.01759/) (2016)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11125/) (2020)
- [Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08417/) (2024)
- [Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14478/) (2021)
- [Quality at a Glance: An Audit of Web-Crawled Multilingual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12028/) (2021)
- [NeMo: a toolkit for building AI applications using Neural Modules](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.09577/) (2019)
- [WikiMatrix: Mining 135M Parallel Sentences in 1620 Language Pairs from Wikipedia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05791/) (2019)
- [CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06243/) (2022)
- [CCMatrix: Mining Billions of High-Quality Parallel Sentences on the WEB](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04944/) (2019)
- [CCAligned: A Massive Collection of Cross-Lingual Web-Document Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.06154/) (2019)
- [Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10369/) (2020)
- [High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09388/) (2021)
- [Bitext Mining Using Distilled Sentence Representations for Low-Resource Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12654/) (2022)
- [Navigating the Metrics Maze: Reconciling Score Magnitudes and Accuracies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06760/) (2024)
- [A Shocking Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05749/) (2024)
- [Direct Preference Optimization for Neural Machine Translation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08380/) (2023)
- [There's no Data Like Better Data: Using QE Metrics for MT Data Filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05350/) (2023)
- [Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09132/) (2023)
- [Building Subject-aligned Comparable Corpora and Mining it for Truly Parallel Sentence Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.08881/) (2015)
- [XLEnt: Mining a Large Cross-lingual Entity Dataset with Lexical-Semantic-Phonetic Word Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08597/) (2021)
- [Advancing Translation Preference Modeling with RLHF: A Step Towards Cost-Effective Solution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11525/) (2024)
- [Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06707/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [SSR-Zero: Simple Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16637/) (2025)
- [Cross-Preference Learning for Sentence-Level and Context-Aware Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25183/) (2026)
- [Beyond Scalar Scores: Reinforcement Learning for Error-Aware Quality Estimation of Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08600/) (2026)
- [Backtranslation Augmented Direct Preference Optimization for Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25702/) (2026)
- [LocQE: Principled Domain Adaptation for Localisation Quality Estimation by Leveraging Post-Edits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18720/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and derivative techniques like Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) are task-alignment algorithms used to repurpose general, foundational models for specific tasks. We show that applying task-alignment to neural machine translation (NMT) addresses an existing task--data mismatch in NMT, leading to improvements across all languages of a multilingual model, even when task-alignment is only applied to a subset of those languages. We do so by introducing Direct Quality Optimization (DQO), a variant of DPO leveraging a pre-trained translation quality estimation model as a proxy for human preferences, and verify the improvements with both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
