# Cross-Lingual and Cross-Cultural Variation in Image Descriptions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16646 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16646/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07082/) (2020)
- [Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10020/) (2022)
- [Visually Grounded Reasoning across Languages and Cultures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13238/) (2021)
- [Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12522/) (2022)
- [Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00914/) (2018)
- [From LLM to NMT: Advancing Low-Resource Machine Translation with Claude](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13813/) (2024)
- [STAIR Captions: Constructing a Large-Scale Japanese Image Caption Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.00823/) (2017)
- [Cross-linguistic differences and similarities in image descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.01736/) (2017)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [MAKIEval: A Multilingual Automatic WiKidata-based Framework for Cultural Awareness Evaluation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21693/) (2025)
- [World in a Frame: Understanding Culture Mixing as a New Challenge for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.22787/) (2025)
- [A Grounded Typology of Word Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10369/) (2024)
- [When concept-based XAI is imprecise: Do people distinguish between generalisations and misrepresentations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17936/) (2025)
- [CultureMINE: Datasets and Methods for Improving the Cultural Capabilities of NLP Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22494/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Do speakers of different languages talk differently about what they see? Behavioural and cognitive studies report cultural effects on perception; however, these are mostly limited in scope and hard to replicate. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of cross-lingual variation in image descriptions. Using a multimodal dataset with 31 languages and images from diverse locations, we develop a method to accurately identify entities mentioned in captions and present in the images, then measure how they vary across languages. Our analysis reveals that pairs of languages that are geographically or genetically closer tend to mention the same entities more frequently. We also identify entity categories whose saliency is universally high (such as animate beings), low (clothing accessories) or displaying high variance across languages (landscape). In a case study, we measure the differences in a specific language pair (e.g., Japanese mentions clothing far more frequently than English). Furthermore, our method corroborates previous small-scale studies, including 1) Rosch et al. (1976)'s theory of basic-level categories, demonstrating a preference for entities that are neither too generic nor too specific, and 2) Miyamoto et al. (2006)'s hypothesis that environments afford patterns of perception, such as entity counts. Overall, our work reveals the presence of both universal and culture-specific patterns in entity mentions.