# Examining the Rat in the Tunnel: Interpretable Multi-Label Classification of Tor-based Malware

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16639 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16639/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- [AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06505/) (2020)
- [Deep Fingerprinting: Undermining Website Fingerprinting Defenses with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.02265/) (2018)
- [k-fingerprinting: a Robust Scalable Website Fingerprinting Technique](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.00789/) (2015)
- [Neural Message Passing for Multi-Label Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08049/) (2019)
- [AVClass2: Massive Malware Tag Extraction from AV Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10615/) (2020)
- [Var-CNN: A Data-Efficient Website Fingerprinting Attack Based on Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10215/) (2018)
- [Tik-Tok: The Utility of Packet Timing in Website Fingerprinting Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06421/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite being the most popular privacy-enhancing network, Tor is increasingly adopted by cybercriminals to obfuscate malicious traffic, hindering the identification of malware-related communications between compromised devices and Command and Control (C&C) servers. This malicious traffic can induce congestion and reduce Tor's performance, while encouraging network administrators to block Tor traffic. Recent research, however, demonstrates the potential for accurately classifying captured Tor traffic as malicious or benign. While existing efforts have addressed malware class identification, their performance remains limited, with micro-average precision and recall values around 70%. Accurately classifying specific malware classes is crucial for effective attack prevention and mitigation. Furthermore, understanding the unique patterns and attack vectors employed by different malware classes helps the development of robust and adaptable defence mechanisms. We utilise a multi-label classification technique based on Message-Passing Neural Networks, demonstrating its superiority over previous approaches such as Binary Relevance, Classifier Chains, and Label Powerset, by achieving micro-average precision (MAP) and recall (MAR) exceeding 90%. Compared to previous work, we significantly improve performance by 19.98%, 10.15%, and 59.21% in MAP, MAR, and Hamming Loss, respectively. Next, we employ Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to interpret the decision-making process within these models. Finally, we assess the robustness of all techniques by crafting adversarial perturbations capable of manipulating classifier predictions and generating false positives and negatives.