# Communication and Energy Efficient Federated Learning using Zero-Order Optimization Technique

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16456 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16456/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07873/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01046/) (2019)
- [Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17333/) (2023)
- [Tighter Theory for Local SGD on Identical and Heterogeneous Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04746/) (2019)
- [Optimal rates for zero-order convex optimization: the power of two function evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.2139/) (2013)
- [FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11418/) (2020)
- [Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11592/) (2024)
- [Distributed Learning with Compressed Gradient Differences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09269/) (2019)
- [LAG: Lazily Aggregated Gradient for Communication-Efficient Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.09965/) (2018)
- [Federated Bayesian Optimization via Thompson Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10154/) (2020)
- [FedDANE: A Federated Newton-Type Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.01920/) (2020)
- [Distributed learning with compressed gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06573/) (2018)
- [FedNew: A Communication-Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Newton-Type Method for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08829/) (2022)
- [Just One Byte (per gradient): A Note on Low-Bandwidth Decentralized Language Model Finetuning Using Shared Randomness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10015/) (2023)
- [Q-GADMM: Quantized Group ADMM for Communication Efficient Decentralized Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10453/) (2019)
- [Green, Quantized Federated Learning over Wireless Networks: An Energy-Efficient Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.09387/) (2022)
- [BAFFLE: A Baseline of Backpropagation-Free Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12195/) (2023)
- [Rendering Wireless Environments Useful for Gradient Estimators: A Zero-Order Stochastic Federated Learning Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17460/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Communication-Efficient Zero-Order and First-Order Federated Learning Methods over Wireless Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08013/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a popular machine learning technique that enables multiple users to collaboratively train a model while maintaining the user data privacy. A significant challenge in FL is the communication bottleneck in the upload direction, and thus the corresponding energy consumption of the devices, attributed to the increasing size of the model/gradient. In this paper, we address this issue by proposing a zero-order (ZO) optimization method that requires the upload of a quantized single scalar per iteration by each device instead of the whole gradient vector. We prove its theoretical convergence and find an upper bound on its convergence rate in the non-convex setting, and we discuss its implementation in practical scenarios. Our FL method and the corresponding convergence analysis take into account the impact of quantization and packet dropping due to wireless errors. We show also the superiority of our method, in terms of communication overhead and energy consumption, as compared to standard gradient-based FL methods.
