# Lessons for Editors of AI Incidents from the AI Incident Database

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16425 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16425/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05791/) (2022)
- [Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.08512/) (2020)
- [Not My Voice! A Taxonomy of Ethical and Safety Harms of Speech Generators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01708/) (2024)
- [A taxonomic system for failure cause analysis of open source AI incidents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07280/) (2022)
- [The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06269/) (2023)
- [Indexing AI Risks with Incidents, Issues, and Variants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.10384/) (2022)
- [Merging AI Incidents Research with Political Misinformation Research: Introducing the Political Deepfakes Incidents Database](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15319/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Incident Analysis for AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14231/) (2025)
- [AI Harmonics: a human-centric and harms severity-adaptive AI risk assessment framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.10104/) (2025)
- [Designing escalation criteria for international AI incident response: criteria, triggers, and thresholds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23183/) (2026)
- [RiskNet: A large-scale dataset of AI risk incidents from news with alignment and multi-dimensional annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08376/) (2026)
- [Unaccountable Delegation, Fading Skills: Mapping the Risks of Workplace AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.08601/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly deployed across the world, they are also increasingly implicated in AI incidents - harm events to individuals and society. As a result, industry, civil society, and governments worldwide are developing best practices and regulations for monitoring and analyzing AI incidents. The AI Incident Database (AIID) is a project that catalogs AI incidents and supports further research by providing a platform to classify incidents for different operational and research-oriented goals. This study reviews the AIID's dataset of 750+ AI incidents and two independent taxonomies applied to these incidents to identify common challenges to indexing and analyzing AI incidents. We find that certain patterns of AI incidents present structural ambiguities that challenge incident databasing and explore how epistemic uncertainty in AI incident reporting is unavoidable. We therefore report mitigations to make incident processes more robust to uncertainty related to cause, extent of harm, severity, or technical details of implicated systems. With these findings, we discuss how to develop future AI incident reporting practices.
