# Combating Spatial Disorientation in a Dynamic Self-Stabilization Task Using AI Assistants

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14565 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14565/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 7 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01290/) (2018)
- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04087/) (2020)
- [Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07015/) (2021)
- [Action Noise in Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning: Impact on Exploration and Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.03787/) (2022)
- [Human-Robot Mutual Adaptation in Shared Autonomy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.07851/) (2017)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial disorientation is a leading cause of fatal aircraft accidents. This paper explores the potential of AI agents to aid pilots in maintaining balance and preventing unrecoverable losses of control by offering cues and corrective measures that ameliorate spatial disorientation. A multi-axis rotation system (MARS) was used to gather data from human subjects self-balancing in a spaceflight analog condition. We trained models over this data to create "digital twins" that exemplified performance characteristics of humans with different proficiency levels. We then trained various reinforcement learning and deep learning models to offer corrective cues if loss of control is predicted. Digital twins and assistant models then co-performed a virtual inverted pendulum (VIP) programmed with identical physics. From these simulations, we picked the 5 best-performing assistants based on task metrics such as crash frequency and mean distance from the direction of balance. These were used in a co-performance study with 20 new human subjects performing a version of the VIP task with degraded spatial information. We show that certain AI assistants were able to improve human performance and that reinforcement-learning based assistants were objectively more effective but rated as less trusted and preferable by humans.