# AggregHate: An Efficient Aggregative Approach for the Detection of Hatemongers on Social Platforms

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14464 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14464/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05322/) (2021)
- [HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15606/) (2020)
- [Attention-based Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.03735/) (2018)
- [Spread of hate speech in online social media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01693/) (2018)
- [Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08977/) (2018)
- [Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.09917/) (2022)
- [Deep Learning Models for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.06465/) (2020)
- [What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.05287/) (2018)
- [Towards Interpretable Hate Speech Detection using Large Language Model-extracted Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.12403/) (2024)
- [A Web of Hate: Tackling Hateful Speech in Online Social Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.10159/) (2017)
- [You too Brutus! Trapping Hateful Users in Social Media: Challenges, Solutions & Insights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00524/) (2021)
- ["Like Sheep Among Wolves": Characterizing Hateful Users on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00317/) (2017)
- [An Early Look at the Parler Online Social Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03820/) (2021)
- [It's a Thin Line Between Love and Hate: Using the Echo in Modeling Dynamics of Racist Online Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.01133/) (2020)
- [From Welcome New Gabbers to the Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting: The Evolution of Gab](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.11278/) (2019)
- [Down the Rabbit Hole: Detecting Online Extremism, Radicalisation, and Politicised Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11579/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic detection of online hate speech serves as a crucial step in the detoxification of the online discourse. Moreover, accurate classification can promote a better understanding of the proliferation of hate as a social phenomenon. While most prior work focus on the detection of hateful utterances, we argue that focusing on the user level is as important, albeit challenging. In this paper we consider a multimodal aggregative approach for the detection of hate-mongers, taking into account the potentially hateful texts, user activity, and the user network. We evaluate our methods on three unique datasets X (Twitter), Gab, and Parler showing that a processing a user's texts in her social context significantly improves the detection of hate mongers, compared to previously used text and graph-based methods. Our method can be then used to improve the classification of coded messages, dog-whistling, and racial gas-lighting, as well as inform intervention measures. Moreover, our approach is highly efficient even for very large datasets and networks.