# Data Poisoning and Leakage Analysis in Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13004 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13004/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 67 of its 101 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Federated unlearning and poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/federated-unlearning-and-poisoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 67)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Deep Learning with Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.00133/) (2016)
- [Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05820/) (2016)
- [Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00420/) (2018)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01046/) (2019)
- [How To Backdoor Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00459/) (2018)
- [An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6211/) (2013)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [Renyi Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.07476/) (2017)
- [Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04049/) (2018)
- [Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00792/) (2018)
- [ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01246/) (2018)
- [Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11815/) (2019)
- [Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00636/) (2018)
- [Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01887/) (2017)
- [Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.07557/) (2017)
- [Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14321/) (2020)
- [iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02610/) (2020)
- [Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12470/) (2018)
- [FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13995/) (2020)
- [Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.07464/) (2017)
- [See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07586/) (2021)
- [Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12101/) (2019)
- [Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05084/) (2020)
- [Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08432/) (2020)
- [Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11571/) (2021)
- [Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07963/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [PCDM: A Diffusion-Based Data Poisoning Attack Against Federated Learning Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16098/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Data poisoning and leakage risks impede the massive deployment of federated learning in the real world. This chapter reveals the truths and pitfalls of understanding two dominating threats: em training data privacy intrusion and em training data poisoning. We first investigate training data privacy threat and present our observations on when and how training data may be leaked during the course of federated training. One promising defense strategy is to perturb the raw gradient update by adding some controlled randomized noise prior to sharing during each round of federated learning. We discuss the importance of determining the proper amount of randomized noise and the proper location to add such noise for effective mitigation of gradient leakage threats against training data privacy. Then we will review and compare different training data poisoning threats and analyze why and when such data poisoning induced model Trojan attacks may lead to detrimental damage on the performance of the global model. We will categorize and compare representative poisoning attacks and the effectiveness of their mitigation techniques, delivering an in-depth understanding of the negative impact of data poisoning. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of dynamic model perturbation in simultaneously ensuring privacy protection, poisoning resilience, and model performance. The chapter concludes with a discussion on additional risk factors in federated learning, including the negative impact of skewness, data and algorithmic biases, as well as misinformation in training data. Powered by empirical evidence, our analytical study offers some transformative insights into effective privacy protection and security assurance strategies in attack-resilient federated learning.