# Assessing the Zero-Shot Capabilities of LLMs for Action Evaluation in RL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12798 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12798/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 37 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01691/) (2022)
- [Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07753/) (2022)
- [Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07207/) (2022)
- [ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11302/) (2022)
- [LM-Nav: Robotic Navigation with Large Pre-Trained Models of Language, Vision, and Action](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04429/) (2022)
- [Describe, Explain, Plan and Select: Interactive Planning with Large Language Models Enables Open-World Multi-Task Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01560/) (2023)
- [Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00050/) (2023)
- [Reward Design with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00001/) (2023)
- [Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06780/) (2021)
- [The NetHack Learning Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.13760/) (2020)
- [Grounding Large Language Models in Interactive Environments with Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02662/) (2023)
- [Guiding Pretraining in Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06692/) (2023)
- [Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07343/) (2019)
- [Using Natural Language for Reward Shaping in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02020/) (2019)
- [Keep CALM and Explore: Language Models for Action Generation in Text-based Games](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02903/) (2020)
- [CLadder: Assessing Causal Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04350/) (2023)
- [Motif: Intrinsic Motivation from Artificial Intelligence Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00166/) (2023)
- [Skill Induction and Planning with Latent Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.01517/) (2021)
- [MiniHack the Planet: A Sandbox for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.13202/) (2021)
- [Craftax: A Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16801/) (2024)
- [Vision-Language Models as a Source of Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09187/) (2023)
- [Counterfactual Credit Assignment in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09464/) (2020)
- [Unpacking Reward Shaping: Understanding the Benefits of Reward Engineering on Sample Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09579/) (2022)
- [Collaborating with language models for embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00763/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Temporal Credit Assignment in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01072/) (2023)
- [Optimizing Agent Behavior over Long Time Scales by Transporting Value](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.06721/) (2018)
- [Plan-Seq-Learn: Language Model Guided RL for Solving Long Horizon Robotics Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01534/) (2024)
- [Improving Intrinsic Exploration with Language Abstractions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08938/) (2022)
- [Read and Reap the Rewards: Learning to Play Atari with the Help of Instruction Manuals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04449/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Leveraging Large Language Models for Effective and Explainable Multi-Agent Credit Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16863/) (2025)
- [HuggingGraph: Understanding the Supply Chain of LLM Ecosystem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14240/) (2025)
- [Reward Modeling for Reinforcement Learning-Based LLM Reasoning: Design, Challenges, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09305/) (2026)
- [Zero-shot Model-based Reinforcement Learning using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11711/) (2024)
- [Aligning Dialogue Agents with Global Feedback via Large Language Model Multimodal Reward Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15922/) (2025)
- [Retrospective In-Context Learning for Temporal Credit Assignment with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.17497/) (2026)
- [medR: Reward Engineering for Clinical Offline Reinforcement Learning via Tri-Drive Potential Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03305/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The temporal credit assignment problem is a central challenge in Reinforcement Learning (RL), concerned with attributing the appropriate influence to each actions in a trajectory for their ability to achieve a goal. However, when feedback is delayed and sparse, the learning signal is poor, and action evaluation becomes harder. Canonical solutions, such as reward shaping and options, require extensive domain knowledge and manual intervention, limiting their scalability and applicability. In this work, we lay the foundations for Credit Assignment with Language Models (CALM), a novel approach that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate credit assignment via reward shaping and options discovery. CALM uses LLMs to decompose a task into elementary subgoals and assess the achievement of these subgoals in state-action transitions. Every time an option terminates, a subgoal is achieved, and CALM provides an auxiliary reward. This additional reward signal can enhance the learning process when the task reward is sparse and delayed without the need for human-designed rewards. We provide a preliminary evaluation of CALM using a dataset of human-annotated demonstrations from MiniHack, suggesting that LLMs can be effective in assigning credit in zero-shot settings, without examples or LLM fine-tuning. Our preliminary results indicate that the knowledge of LLMs is a promising prior for credit assignment in RL, facilitating the transfer of human knowledge into value functions.
