# Measuring Human and AI Values Based on Generative Psychometrics with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12106 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12106/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 46 of its 111 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04652/) (2024)
- [InternLM2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17297/) (2024)
- [AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19852/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05044/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14324/) (2023)
- [Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17466/) (2023)
- [Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03958/) (2023)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [Personality Traits in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00184/) (2023)
- [Political Compass or Spinning Arrow? Towards More Meaningful Evaluations for Values and Opinions in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16786/) (2024)
- [Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13722/) (2022)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Duties](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00779/) (2023)
- [Moral Mimicry: Large Language Models Produce Moral Rationalizations Tailored to Political Identity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12106/) (2022)
- [Questioning the Survey Responses of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07951/) (2023)
- [Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01248/) (2023)
- [Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16180/) (2023)
- [Value FULCRA: Mapping Large Language Models to the Multidimensional Spectrum of Basic Human Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10766/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08640/) (2025)
- [AuroRA: Breaking Low-Rank Bottleneck of LoRA with Nonlinear Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18738/) (2025)
- [A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04491/) (2025)
- [Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach for Constructing Value Systems in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02444/) (2025)
- [AdAEM: An Adaptively and Automated Extensible Measurement of LLMs' Value Difference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13531/) (2025)
- [Human Values in a Single Sentence: Moral Presence, Hierarchies, and Transformer Ensembles on the Schwartz Continuum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14172/) (2026)
- [Do Schwartz Higher-Order Values Help Sentence-Level Human Value Detection? A Study of Hierarchical Gating and Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00913/) (2026)
- [The Trust in AI-Generated Health Advice (TAIGHA) Scale and Short Version (TAIGHA-S): Development and Validation Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14278/) (2025)
- [Distributional Open-Ended Evaluation of LLM Cultural Value Alignment Based on Value Codebook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06210/) (2026)
- [Are We Aligned? A Preliminary Investigation of the Alignment of Responsible AI Values between LLMs and Human Judgment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04157/) (2025)
- [Discovering Implicit Large Language Model Alignment Objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15338/) (2026)
- [Which Values Do LLMs Confuse? A Schwartz-Based Recognition Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20270/) (2026)
- [Values as Style: Disentangling Values from Semantics with One-Way Mixing for Low-Damage LLM Steering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.39701/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Human values and their measurement are long-standing interdisciplinary inquiry. Recent advances in AI have sparked renewed interest in this area, with large language models (LLMs) emerging as both tools and subjects of value measurement. This work introduces Generative Psychometrics for Values (GPV), an LLM-based, data-driven value measurement paradigm, theoretically grounded in text-revealed selective perceptions. The core idea is to dynamically parse unstructured texts into perceptions akin to static stimuli in traditional psychometrics, measure the value orientations they reveal, and aggregate the results. Applying GPV to human-authored blogs, we demonstrate its stability, validity, and superiority over prior psychological tools. Then, extending GPV to LLM value measurement, we advance the current art with 1) a psychometric methodology that measures LLM values based on their scalable and free-form outputs, enabling context-specific measurement; 2) a comparative analysis of measurement paradigms, indicating response biases of prior methods; and 3) an attempt to bridge LLM values and their safety, revealing the predictive power of different value systems and the impacts of various values on LLM safety. Through interdisciplinary efforts, we aim to leverage AI for next-generation psychometrics and psychometrics for value-aligned AI.