# GLEAN: Generative Learning for Eliminating Adversarial Noise

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10578 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10578/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2024.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/robustness-privacy-and-adversarial-aspects/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07004/) (2016)
- [Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04587/) (2015)
- [Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04222/) (2023)
- [Raising the Cost of Malicious AI-Powered Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06588/) (2023)
- [Mist: Towards Improved Adversarial Examples for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12683/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12027/) (2024)
- [IMPRESS: Evaluating the Resilience of Imperceptible Perturbations Against Unauthorized Data Usage in Diffusion-Based Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19248/) (2023)
- [A Response to Glaze Purification via IMPRESS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07731/) (2023)
- [FREDSR: Fourier Residual Efficient Diffusive GAN for Single Image Super Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16678/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In the age of powerful diffusion models such as DALL-E and Stable Diffusion, many in the digital art community have suffered style mimicry attacks due to fine-tuning these models on their works. The ability to mimic an artist's style via text-to-image diffusion models raises serious ethical issues, especially without explicit consent. Glaze, a tool that applies various ranges of perturbations to digital art, has shown significant success in preventing style mimicry attacks, at the cost of artifacts ranging from imperceptible noise to severe quality degradation. The release of Glaze has sparked further discussions regarding the effectiveness of similar protection methods. In this paper, we propose GLEAN- applying I2I generative networks to strip perturbations from Glazed images, evaluating the performance of style mimicry attacks before and after GLEAN on the results of Glaze. GLEAN aims to support and enhance Glaze by highlighting its limitations and encouraging further development.