# LaMsS: When Large Language Models Meet Self-Skepticism

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06601 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.06601/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00027/) (2020)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14334/) (2022)
- [Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14525/) (2023)
- [Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01219/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06435/) (2023)
- [Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00159/) (2024)
- [Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18930/) (2024)
- [Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01017/) (2021)
- [Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12813/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11495/) (2023)
- [LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross Examination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13281/) (2023)
- [WiCE: Real-World Entailment for Claims in Wikipedia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01432/) (2023)
- [R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09677/) (2023)
- [TruthX: Alleviating Hallucinations by Editing Large Language Models in Truthful Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17811/) (2024)
- [Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05612/) (2024)
- [Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06448/) (2024)
- [Self-Alignment for Factuality: Mitigating Hallucinations in LLMs via Self-Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09267/) (2024)
- [Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15993/) (2024)
- [Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00186/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Large Language Model Hallucinations via Autonomous Knowledge Graph-based Retrofitting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13314/) (2023)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10189/) (2024)
- [Halo: Estimation and Reduction of Hallucinations in Open-Source Weak Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11764/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Ask, Condition or Abstain: Reinforcement Learning for Missing-Premise Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16554/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination is a major challenge for large language models (LLMs), preventing their further application in some fields. The skeptical thinking of humankind could be useful for LLMs to self-cognition, self-reflection and alleviate their hallucinations. Inspired by this consideration, we propose a novel approach called LaMsS, which combines the semantic understanding capability of LLMs with self-skepticism. By introducing a series of skepticism tokens and augmenting them into the vocabulary, we conduct both pertaining and finetuning, which allow the LLM to decode each normal token followed by a skeptical token, representing different skepticism levels. By calculating the response skepticism given a query, one can define a new self-aware LLM which is only willing to answer with relative lower skepticism level than the threshold. By examining the accuracy, AUC and AP of willingly answering questions, we demonstrate that LaMsS achieves better performance than baselines on both multi-choice questions and open-domain question-answering benchmarks, and can generalize to multi-task and out-of-domain settings. Our study sheds some lights on the self-skepticism modeling on further artificial intelligence. Project code and model checkpoints can be found in https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SM-1E76.