# Exploring Straightforward Conversational Red-Teaming

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04822 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04822/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08419/) (2023)
- [Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.06674/) (2023)
- [Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03693/) (2023)
- [OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07327/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09419/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model Alignment: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15025/) (2023)
- [Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09283/) (2024)
- [Chain of Attack: a Semantic-Driven Contextual Multi-Turn attacker for LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.05610/) (2024)
- [Speak Out of Turn: Safety Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Multi-turn Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17262/) (2024)
- [Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18540/) (2024)
- [Understanding Multi-Turn Toxic Behaviors in Open-Domain Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09579/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15398/) (2024)
- [Adaptive Instruction Composition for Automated LLM Red-Teaming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21159/) (2026)
- [FoeGlass: Simple In-Context Learning Is Enough for Red Teaming Audio Deepfake Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05101/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in business dialogue systems but they pose security and ethical risks. Multi-turn conversations, where context influences the model's behavior, can be exploited to produce undesired responses. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of utilizing off-the-shelf LLMs in straightforward red-teaming approaches, where an attacker LLM aims to elicit undesired output from a target LLM, comparing both single-turn and conversational red-teaming tactics. Our experiments offer insights into various usage strategies that significantly affect their performance as red teamers. They suggest that off-the-shelf models can act as effective red teamers and even adjust their attack strategy based on past attempts, although their effectiveness decreases with greater alignment.