# Cycle Pixel Difference Network for Crisp Edge Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04272 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04272/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01507/) (2017)
- [ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00808/) (2023)
- [Holistically-Nested Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06375/) (2015)
- [Pixel Difference Networks for Efficient Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07009/) (2021)
- [Learning Rich Features from RGB-D Images for Object Detection and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1407.5736/) (2014)
- [Learning to predict crisp boundaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.10097/) (2018)
- [Bi-Directional Cascade Network for Perceptual Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10903/) (2019)
- [Fast Edge Detection Using Structured Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.5549/) (2014)
- [DeepEdge: A Multi-Scale Bifurcated Deep Network for Top-Down Contour Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1123/) (2014)
- [Dense Extreme Inception Network for Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02250/) (2021)
- [DiffusionEdge: Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Crisp Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.02032/) (2024)
- [Unmixing Convolutional Features for Crisp Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09808/) (2020)
- [Edge-guided Non-local Fully Convolutional Network for Salient Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02460/) (2019)
- [Deep Crisp Boundaries: From Boundaries to Higher-level Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.02439/) (2018)
- [Delving into Crispness: Guided Label Refinement for Crisp Edge Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15172/) (2023)
- [Recurrent Generic Contour-based Instance Segmentation with Progressive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08898/) (2023)
- [Learning Crisp Boundaries Using Deep Refinement Network and Adaptive Weighting Loss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01301/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Generative Edge Detection with Stable Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03080/) (2024)
- [Boosting Edge Detection with Pixel-wise Feature Selection: The Extractor-Selector Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02534/) (2025)
- [MatchED: Crisp Edge Detection Using End-to-End, Matching-based Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20689/) (2026)
- [MS2Edge: Towards Energy-Efficient and Crisp Edge Detection with Multi-Scale Residual Learning in SNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13735/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Edge detection, as a fundamental task in computer vision, has garnered increasing attention. The advent of deep learning has significantly advanced this field. However, recent deep learning-based methods generally face two significant issues: 1) reliance on large-scale pre-trained weights, and 2) generation of thick edges. We construct a U-shape encoder-decoder model named CPD-Net that successfully addresses these two issues simultaneously. In response to issue 1), we propose a novel cycle pixel difference convolution (CPDC), which effectively integrates edge prior knowledge with modern convolution operations, consequently successfully eliminating the dependence on large-scale pre-trained weights. As for issue 2), we construct a multi-scale information enhancement module (MSEM) and a dual residual connection-based (DRC) decoder to enhance the edge location ability of the model, thereby generating crisp and clean contour maps. Comprehensive experiments conducted on four standard benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves competitive performance on the BSDS500 dataset (ODS=0.813 and AC=0.352), NYUD-V2 (ODS=0.760 and AC=0.223), BIPED dataset (ODS=0.898 and AC=0.426), and CID (ODS=0.59). Our approach provides a novel perspective for addressing these challenges in edge detection.