# A Noise and Edge extraction-based dual-branch method for Shallowfake and Deepfake Localization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00896 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00896/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 61 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.05587/) (2017)
- [Searching for MobileNetV3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02244/) (2019)
- [FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08971/) (2019)
- [Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06564/) (2020)
- [Learning Rich Features for Image Manipulation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04953/) (2018)
- [PSCC-Net: Progressive Spatio-Channel Correlation Network for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10596/) (2021)
- [MVSS-Net: Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervised Networks for Image Manipulation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08935/) (2021)
- [Noiseprint: a CNN-based camera model fingerprint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08396/) (2018)
- [Image Manipulation Detection by Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06832/) (2021)
- [SPAN: Spatial Pyramid Attention Network forImage Manipulation Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.00726/) (2020)
- [ObjectFormer for Image Manipulation Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14681/) (2022)
- [Image Splicing Localization Using A Multi-Task Fully Convolutional Network (MFCN)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.02016/) (2017)
- [Hybrid LSTM and Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Detection of Image Forgeries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02495/) (2019)
- [IML-ViT: Benchmarking Image Manipulation Localization by Vision Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14863/) (2023)
- [Detect and Locate: Exposing Face Manipulation by Semantic- and Noise-level Telltales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.05821/) (2021)
- [Generate, Segment and Refine: Towards Generic Manipulation Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.09729/) (2018)
- [Constrained R-CNN: A general image manipulation detection model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08217/) (2019)
- [TransForensics: Image Forgery Localization with Dense Self-Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03871/) (2021)
- [Weakly-supervised deepfake localization in diffusion-generated images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04584/) (2023)
- [Detect Any Deepfakes: Segment Anything Meets Face Forgery Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17075/) (2023)
- [Effective Image Tampering Localization via Enhanced Transformer and Co-attention Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09306/) (2023)
- [Noise and Edge Based Dual Branch Image Manipulation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00724/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21157/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The trustworthiness of multimedia is being increasingly evaluated by advanced Image Manipulation Localization (IML) techniques, resulting in the emergence of the IML field. An effective manipulation model necessitates the extraction of non-semantic differential features between manipulated and legitimate sections to utilize artifacts. This requires direct comparisons between the two regions.. Current models employ either feature approaches based on handcrafted features, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), or a hybrid approach that combines both. Handcrafted feature approaches presuppose tampering in advance, hence restricting their effectiveness in handling various tampering procedures, but CNNs capture semantic information, which is insufficient for addressing manipulation artifacts. In order to address these constraints, we have developed a dual-branch model that integrates manually designed feature noise with conventional CNN features. This model employs a dual-branch strategy, where one branch integrates noise characteristics and the other branch integrates RGB features using the hierarchical ConvNext Module. In addition, the model utilizes edge supervision loss to acquire boundary manipulation information, resulting in accurate localization at the edges. Furthermore, this architecture utilizes a feature augmentation module to optimize and refine the presentation of attributes. The shallowfakes dataset (CASIA, COVERAGE, COLUMBIA, NIST16) and deepfake dataset Faceforensics++ (FF++) underwent thorough testing to demonstrate their outstanding ability to extract features and their superior performance compared to other baseline models. The AUC score achieved an astounding 99%. The model is superior in comparison and easily outperforms the existing state-of-the-art (SoTA) models.