# Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.17017 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17017/

## Key facts

- Cited by 63 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Let's Verify Step by Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20050/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09513/) (2022)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02235/) (2021)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.03816/) (2024)
- [How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowball](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13534/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Better Reasoners with Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09561/) (2022)
- [Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06782/) (2024)
- [ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07919/) (2022)
- [SelfCheck: Using LLMs to Zero-Shot Check Their Own Step-by-Step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00436/) (2023)
- [The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04925/) (2024)
- [Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11860/) (2023)
- [Question Decomposition Improves the Faithfulness of Model-Generated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11768/) (2023)
- [Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10480/) (2024)
- [Human Feedback is not Gold Standard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16349/) (2023)
- [Can ChatGPT Replace Traditional KBQA Models? An In-depth Analysis of the Question Answering Performance of the GPT LLM Family](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07992/) (2023)
- [Compression, Transduction, and Creation: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06379/) (2021)
- [Integrate the Essence and Eliminate the Dross: Fine-Grained Self-Consistency for Free-Form Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02056/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 63)

- [Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16419/) (2025)
- [Deep Think with Confidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15260/) (2025)
- [Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10903/) (2025)
- [From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14111/) (2025)
- [Efficient Test-Time Scaling via Self-Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00031/) (2025)
- [Efficiently Scaling LLM Reasoning with Certaindex](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20993/) (2024)
- [Budget-Aware Tool Use Enables Effective Agent Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17006/) (2025)
- [Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24377/) (2025)
- [Video-RTS: Rethinking Reinforcement Learning and Test-Time Scaling for Efficient and Enhanced Video Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06485/) (2025)
- [Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02076/) (2025)
- [AlphaOne: Reasoning Models Thinking Slow and Fast at Test Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24863/) (2025)
- [From Medprompt to o1: Exploration of Run-Time Strategies for Medical Challenge Problems and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03590/) (2024)
- [Verifier-free Test-Time Sampling for Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05681/) (2025)
- [Generative AI Act II: Test Time Scaling Drives Cognition Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13828/) (2025)
- [Lost at the Beginning of Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22058/) (2025)
- [Prompt-Reverse Inconsistency: LLM Self-Inconsistency Beyond Generative Randomness and Prompt Paraphrasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01282/) (2025)
- [Do Repetitions Matter? Strengthening Reliability in LLM Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24086/) (2025)
- [Parallel-Probe: Towards Efficient Parallel Thinking via 2D Probing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.03845/) (2026)
- [Geometric Uncertainty for Detecting and Correcting Hallucinations in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13813/) (2025)
- [Slim-SC: Thought Pruning for Efficient Scaling with Self-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13990/) (2025)
- [Certified Self-Consistency: Statistical Guarantees and Test-Time Training for Reliable Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17472/) (2025)
- [Exploring the System 1 Thinking Capability of Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10368/) (2025)
- [PiCSAR: Probabilistic Confidence Selection And Ranking for Reasoning Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21787/) (2025)
- [LLMs Improving LLMs: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08083/) (2026)
- [Disparities in LLM Reasoning Accuracy and Explanations: A Case Study on African American English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04099/) (2025)
- [What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06998/) (2025)
- [Autonomous Control Leveraging LLMs: An Agentic Framework for Next-Generation Industrial Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07115/) (2025)
- [Neural Chain-of-Thought Search: Searching the Optimal Reasoning Path to Enhance Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11340/) (2026)
- [Optimal Bayesian Stopping for Efficient Inference of Consistent LLM Answers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05395/) (2026)
- [Agentic Test-Time Scaling for WebAgents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12276/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Self-Consistency mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by sampling multiple reasoning paths,but it lacks a systematic approach to determine the optimal number of samples or select the most faithful rationale. To address this limitation, we introduce Reasoning-Aware Self-Consistency (RASC), a novel framework that enhances sampling efficiency and reasoning faithfulness by dynamically evaluating both outputs and rationales. RASC assesses the quality of reasoning and the consistency of answers for each generated sample, using these assessments to guide early stopping decisions and rationale selection. The framework employs criteria-based stopping and weighted majority voting, enabling more informed choices on when to halt sampling and which rationale to select. Our comprehensive experiments across diverse question-answering datasets demonstrate that RASC outperforms existing methods, reducing sample usage by approximately 70% while maintaining accuracy. Moreover, RASC facilitates the selection of high-fidelity rationales, thereby improving the faithfulness of LLM outputs. Our approach effectively addresses the efficiency-accuracy trade-off in LLM reasoning tasks, offering a new perspective for more nuanced, faithful, and effective utilization of LLMs in resource-constrained environments.