# Evaluating Deep Learning Models for Breast Cancer Classification: A Comparative Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16859 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16859/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11946/) (2019)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [End-to-end Training for Whole Image Breast Cancer Diagnosis using An All Convolutional Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05775/) (2017)
- [Vision Mamba for Classification of Breast Ultrasound Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03552/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Interpretable Tile-Based Classification of Paclitaxel Exposure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23363/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study evaluates the effectiveness of deep learning models in classifying histopathological images for early and accurate detection of breast cancer. Eight advanced models, including ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, ResNeXt-50, Vision Transformer (ViT), GoogLeNet (Inception v3), EfficientNet, MobileNet, and SqueezeNet, were compared using a dataset of 277,524 image patches. The Vision Transformer (ViT) model, with its attention-based mechanisms, achieved the highest validation accuracy of 94%, outperforming conventional CNNs. The study demonstrates the potential of advanced machine learning methods to enhance precision and efficiency in breast cancer diagnosis in clinical settings.