# Comparing the Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coefficients Across Distributions and Sample Sizes: A Tutorial Using Simulations and Empirical Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15979 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15979/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Revisiting Epistemic Markers in Confidence Estimation: Can Markers Accurately Reflect Large Language Models' Uncertainty?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.24778/) (2025)
- [When Semantics Mislead Vision: Mitigating Large Multimodal Models Hallucinations in Scene Text Spotting and Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05551/) (2025)
- [Data Efficacy for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21545/) (2025)
- [GMTRouter: Personalized LLM Router over Multi-turn User Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08590/) (2025)
- [CSNR and JMIM Based Spectral Band Selection for Reducing Metamerism in Urban Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10962/) (2025)
- [EduVidQA: Generating and Evaluating Long-form Answers to Student Questions based on Lecture Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24120/) (2025)
- [Optimal word order for non-causal text generation with Large Language Models: the Spanish case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14451/) (2025)
- [Re-understanding Graph Unlearning through Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14694/) (2026)
- [FoMo X: Modular Explainability Signals for Outlier Detection Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17570/) (2026)
- [GNN-based Decentralized Perception in Multirobot Systems for Predicting Worker Actions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04193/) (2025)
- [Standardization of Weighted Ranking Correlation Coefficients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08428/) (2025)
- [Topology of Currencies: Persistent Homology for FX Co-movements: A Comparative Clustering Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19306/) (2025)
- [TangledFeatures: Robust Feature Selection in Highly Correlated Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15005/) (2025)
- [Translation from the Information Bottleneck Perspective: an Efficiency Analysis of Spatial Prepositions in Bitexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19924/) (2026)
- [An Interpretable Closed-Loop Intelligent Tutoring System for Multimodal Affective Feedback in Asynchronous Presentation Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17468/) (2026)
- [SymboLLM-FE: LLM-Accelerated Symbolic Regression for Automated Feature Engineering on Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28408/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (rp) and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) are widely used in psychological research. We compare rp and rs on 3 criteria: variability, bias with respect to the population value, and robustness to an outlier. Using simulations across low (N = 5) to high (N = 1,000) sample sizes we show that, for normally distributed variables, rp and rs have similar expected values but rs is more variable, especially when the correlation is strong. However, when the variables have high kurtosis, rp is more variable than rs. Next, we conducted a sampling study of a psychometric dataset featuring symmetrically distributed data with light tails, and of 2 Likert-type survey datasets, 1 with light-tailed and the other with heavy-tailed distributions. Consistent with the simulations, rp had lower variability than rs in the psychometric dataset. In the survey datasets with heavy-tailed variables in particular, rs had lower variability than rp, and often corresponded more accurately to the population Pearson correlation coefficient (Rp) than rp did. The simulations and the sampling studies showed that variability in terms of standard deviations can be reduced by about 20% by choosing rs instead of rp. In comparison, increasing the sample size by a factor of 2 results in a 41% reduction of the standard deviations of rs and rp. In conclusion, rp is suitable for light-tailed distributions, whereas rs is preferable when variables feature heavy-tailed distributions or when outliers are present, as is often the case in psychological research.