# Advanced POD-Based Performance Evaluation of Classifiers Applied to Human Driver Lane Changing Prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15722 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15722/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 99 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02640/) (2015)
- [RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12039/) (2020)
- [FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1504.06852/) (2015)
- [PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.08785/) (2020)
- [Learning from Synthetic Humans](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.01370/) (2017)
- [EquiBind: Geometric Deep Learning for Drug Binding Structure Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05146/) (2022)
- [Pre-training without Natural Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.08515/) (2021)
- [Diversify Your Vision Datasets with Automatic Diffusion-Based Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16289/) (2023)
- [Learning from Synthetic Animals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08265/) (2019)
- [Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08207/) (2018)
- [DeepPicker: a Deep Learning Approach for Fully Automated Particle Picking in Cryo-EM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.01838/) (2016)
- [Early Lane Change Prediction for Automated Driving Systems Using Multi-Task Attention-based Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10742/) (2021)
- [APPLE Picker: Automatic Particle Picking, a Low-Effort Cryo-EM Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00469/) (2018)
- [CryoGEM: Physics-Informed Generative Cryo-Electron Microscopy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.02235/) (2023)
- [Adapting Segment Anything Model (SAM) through Prompt-based Learning for Enhanced Protein Identification in Cryo-EM Micrographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16140/) (2023)
- [CryoMAE: Few-Shot Cryo-EM Particle Picking with Masked Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10178/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) classifiers serve as essential tools facilitating classification and prediction across various domains. The performance of these algorithms should be known to ensure their reliable application. In certain fields, receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves are frequently employed to assess machine learning algorithms without accounting for the impact of process parameters. However, it may be essential to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in relation to such parameters. As a performance evaluation metric capable of considering the effects of process parameters, this paper uses a modified probability of detection (POD) approach to assess the reliability of ML-based algorithms. As an example, the POD-based approach is employed to assess ML models used for predicting the lane changing behavior of a vehicle driver. The time remaining to the predicted (and therefore unknown) lane changing event is considered as process parameter. The hit/miss approach to POD is taken here and modified by considering the probability of lane changing derived from ML algorithms at each time step, and obtaining the final result of the analysis accordingly. This improves the reliability of results compared to the standard hit/miss approach, which considers the outcome of the classifiers as either 0 or 1, while also simplifying evaluation compared to the a versus a approach. Performance evaluation results of the proposed approach are compared with those obtained with the standard hit/miss approach and a pre-developed a versus a approach to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The comparison shows that this method provides an averaging conservative behavior with the advantage of enhancing the reliability of the hit/miss approach to POD while retaining its simplicity.