# Evaluating Attribute Comprehension in Large Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13898 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13898/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10592/) (2023)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.07651/) (2021)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04870/) (2015)
- [Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.08981/) (2021)
- [mPLUG: Effective and Efficient Vision-Language Learning by Cross-modal Skip-connections](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12005/) (2022)
- [Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00070/) (2023)
- [VL-CheckList: Evaluating Pre-trained Vision-Language Models with Objects, Attributes and Relations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00221/) (2022)
- [Yin and Yang: Balancing and Answering Binary Visual Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05099/) (2015)
- [Learning to Predict Visual Attributes in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09707/) (2021)
- [Open-Set Image Tagging with Multi-Grained Text Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15200/) (2023)
- [Open-vocabulary Attribute Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12914/) (2022)
- [CRIC: A VQA Dataset for Compositional Reasoning on Vision and Commonsense](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.02962/) (2019)
- [Multi-Task Learning via Co-Attentive Sharing for Pedestrian Attribute Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03164/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Zero-Shot Product Attribute Labeling with Vision-Language Models: A Three-Tier Evaluation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15711/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Currently, large vision-language models have gained promising progress on many downstream tasks. However, they still suffer many challenges in fine-grained visual understanding tasks, such as object attribute comprehension. Besides, there have been growing efforts on the evaluations of large vision-language models, but lack of in-depth study of attribute comprehension and the visual language fine-tuning process. In this paper, we propose to evaluate the attribute comprehension ability of large vision-language models from two perspectives: attribute recognition and attribute hierarchy understanding. We evaluate three vision-language interactions, including visual question answering, image-text matching, and image-text cosine similarity. Furthermore, we explore the factors affecting attribute comprehension during fine-tuning. Through a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments, we introduce three main findings: (1) Large vision-language models possess good attribute recognition ability, but their hierarchical understanding ability is relatively limited. (2) Compared to ITC, ITM exhibits superior capability in capturing finer details, making it more suitable for attribute understanding tasks. (3) The attribute information in the captions used for fine-tuning plays a crucial role in attribute understanding. We hope this work can help guide future progress in fine-grained visual understanding of large vision-language models.