# SPARK: Multi-Vision Sensor Perception and Reasoning Benchmark for Large-scale Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12114 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12114/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06281/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16821/) (2024)
- [SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16125/) (2023)
- [CogVLM: Visual Expert for Pretrained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03079/) (2023)
- [GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01415/) (2023)
- [PandaGPT: One Model To Instruction-Follow Them All](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16355/) (2023)
- [Target-aware Dual Adversarial Learning and a Multi-scenario Multi-Modality Benchmark to Fuse Infrared and Visible for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16220/) (2022)
- [Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06394/) (2023)
- [LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09265/) (2023)
- [InternLM-XComposer-2.5: A Versatile Large Vision Language Model Supporting Long-Contextual Input and Output](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03320/) (2024)
- [mPLUG-DocOwl: Modularized Multimodal Large Language Model for Document Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02499/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08632/) (2024)
- [DIML/CVL RGB-D Dataset: 2M RGB-D Images of Natural Indoor and Outdoor Scenes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11590/) (2021)
- [SHIELD : An Evaluation Benchmark for Face Spoofing and Forgery Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04178/) (2024)
- [MoAI: Mixture of All Intelligence for Large Language and Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07508/) (2024)
- [Meteor: Mamba-based Traversal of Rationale for Large Language and Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15574/) (2024)
- [CoLLaVO: Crayon Large Language and Vision mOdel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11248/) (2024)
- [TroL: Traversal of Layers for Large Language and Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12246/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Eagle 2: Building Post-Training Data Strategies from Scratch for Frontier Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.14818/) (2025)
- [FineVision: Open Data Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17269/) (2025)
- [LocateAnything: Fast and High-Quality Vision-Language Grounding with Parallel Box Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27365/) (2026)
- [Phantom of Latent for Large Language and Vision Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14713/) (2024)
- [LocateAnything3D: Vision-Language 3D Detection with Chain-of-Sight](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20648/) (2025)
- [Agent Explorative Policy Optimization for Multimodal Agentic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.28774/) (2026)
- [Zone of Proximal Policy Optimization: Teacher in Prompts, Not Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18216/) (2026)
- [Xuanwu: Evolving General Multimodal Models into an Industrial-Grade Foundation for Content Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29211/) (2026)
- [Does Seeing More Mean Knowing More? Mono-Anchored Advantage Normalization for Multi-Source Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25437/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly advanced with text-aligned vision inputs. They have made remarkable progress in computer vision tasks by aligning text modality with vision inputs. There are also endeavors to incorporate multi-vision sensors beyond RGB, including thermal, depth, and medical X-ray images. However, we observe that current LVLMs view images taken from multi-vision sensors as if they were in the same RGB domain without considering the physical characteristics of multi-vision sensors. They fail to convey the fundamental multi-vision sensor information from the dataset and the corresponding contextual knowledge properly. Consequently, alignment between the information from the actual physical environment and the text is not achieved correctly, making it difficult to answer complex sensor-related questions that consider the physical environment. In this paper, we aim to establish a multi-vision Sensor Perception And Reasoning benchmarK called SPARK that can reduce the fundamental multi-vision sensor information gap between images and multi-vision sensors. We generated 6,248 vision-language test samples to investigate multi-vision sensory perception and multi-vision sensory reasoning on physical sensor knowledge proficiency across different formats, covering different types of sensor-related questions. We utilized these samples to assess ten leading LVLMs. The results showed that most models displayed deficiencies in multi-vision sensory reasoning to varying extents. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/top-yun/SPARK