# See What LLMs Cannot Answer: A Self-Challenge Framework for Uncovering LLM Weaknesses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08978 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08978/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 69 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 69)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07909/) (2015)
- [PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11641/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.10044/) (2019)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07911/) (2023)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models as Optimizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03409/) (2023)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08322/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Conformity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12428/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model Reasoning Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06176/) (2026)
- [LoGU: Long-form Generation with Uncertainty Expressions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14309/) (2024)
- [Reverse Question Answering: Can an LLM Write a Question so Hard (or Bad) that it Can't Answer?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15512/) (2024)
- [MindGuard: Towards Accessible and Sitgma-free Mental Health First Aid via Edge LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10064/) (2024)
- [ProMind-LLM: Proactive Mental Health Care via Causal Reasoning with Sensor Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14038/) (2025)
- [Are You Human? An Adversarial Benchmark to Expose LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09569/) (2024)
- [Adaptively profiling models with task elicitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01986/) (2025)
- [MELAC: Massive Evaluation of Large Language Models with Alignment of Culture in Persian Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00673/) (2025)
- [The Gold Medals in an Empty Room: Diagnosing Metalinguistic Reasoning in LLMs with Camlang](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00425/) (2025)
- [Code-driven Number Sequence Calculation: Enhancing the inductive Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14620/) (2025)
- [Red Teaming Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.00412/) (2025)
- [CoMAI: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Robust and Equitable Interview Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16215/) (2026)
- [Reforming the Mechanism: Editing Reasoning Patterns in LLMs with Circuit Reshaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06923/) (2026)
- [PledgeTracker: A System for Monitoring the Fulfilment of Pledges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11804/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The impressive performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) has consistently surpassed numerous human-designed benchmarks, presenting new challenges in assessing the shortcomings of LLMs. Designing tasks and finding LLMs' limitations are becoming increasingly important. In this paper, we investigate the question of whether an LLM can discover its own limitations from the errors it makes. To this end, we propose a Self-Challenge evaluation framework with human-in-the-loop. Starting from seed instances that GPT-4 fails to answer, we prompt GPT-4 to summarize error patterns that can be used to generate new instances and incorporate human feedback on them to refine these patterns for generating more challenging data, iteratively. We end up with 8 diverse patterns, such as text manipulation and questions with assumptions. We then build a benchmark, SC-G4, consisting of 1,835 instances generated by GPT-4 using these patterns, with human-annotated gold responses. The SC-G4 serves as a challenging benchmark that allows for a detailed assessment of LLMs' abilities. Our results show that only 44.96% of instances in SC-G4 can be answered correctly by GPT-4. Interestingly, our pilot study indicates that these error patterns also challenge other LLMs, such as Claude-3 and Llama-3, and cannot be fully resolved through fine-tuning. Our work takes the first step to demonstrate that LLMs can autonomously identify their inherent flaws and provide insights for future dynamic and automatic evaluation.