# GlyphPattern: An Abstract Pattern Recognition Benchmark for Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05894 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05894/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00491/) (2018)
- [What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19785/) (2023)
- [RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02741/) (2019)
- [CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07796/) (2022)
- [Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04225/) (2018)
- [Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00763/) (2020)
- [COLA: A Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03689/) (2023)
- [A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05379/) (2022)
- [Abstract Visual Reasoning with Tangram Shapes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16492/) (2022)
- [Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13803/) (2022)
- [V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive Matrices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.12271/) (2019)
- [Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10207/) (2023)
- [A Surprising Failure? Multimodal LLMs and the NLVR Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17793/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) building upon the foundation of powerful large language models have made rapid progress in reasoning across visual and textual data. While VLMs perform well on vision tasks that they are trained on, our results highlight key challenges in abstract pattern recognition. We present GlyphPattern, a 954 item dataset that pairs 318 human-written descriptions of visual patterns from 40 writing systems with three visual presentation styles. GlyphPattern evaluates abstract pattern recognition in VLMs, requiring models to understand and judge natural language descriptions of visual patterns. GlyphPattern patterns are drawn from a large-scale cognitive science investigation of human writing systems; as a result, they are rich in spatial reference and compositionality. Our experiments show that GlyphPattern is challenging for state-of-the-art VLMs (GPT-4o achieves only 55% accuracy), with marginal gains from few-shot prompting. Our detailed error analysis reveals challenges at multiple levels, including visual processing, natural language understanding, and pattern generalization.