# Order Matters in Hallucination: Reasoning Order as Benchmark and Reflexive Prompting for Large-Language-Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05093 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05093/

## Key facts

- Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Hallucination detection and mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/hallucination-detection-and-mitigation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07958/) (2021)
- [BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17564/) (2023)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11495/) (2023)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08726/) (2022)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01313/) (2024)
- [Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02226/) (2023)
- [Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09150/) (2022)
- [Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10844/) (2023)
- [LLM Lies: Hallucinations are not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01469/) (2023)
- [On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03642/) (2020)
- [Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15852/) (2023)
- [Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06794/) (2023)
- [Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06271/) (2023)
- [LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08124/) (2020)
- [Why Does ChatGPT Fall Short in Providing Truthful Answers?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10513/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03871/) (2025)
- [Frontier LLMs Still Struggle with Simple Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07313/) (2025)
- [Recitation over Reasoning: How Cutting-Edge Language Models Can Fail on Elementary School-Level Reasoning Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00509/) (2025)
- [StreamingThinker: Large Language Models Can Think While Reading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.17238/) (2025)
- [TruthPrInt: Mitigating Large Vision-Language Models Object Hallucination Via Latent Truthful-Guided Pre-Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10602/) (2025)
- [ZoomV: Temporal Zoom-in for Efficient Long Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01407/) (2025)
- [Relative Bias: A Comparative Framework for Quantifying Bias in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17131/) (2025)
- [Trustworthy Reasoning: Evaluating and Enhancing Factual Accuracy in LLM Intermediate Thought Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.22940/) (2025)
- [AVRT: Audio-Visual Reasoning Transfer through Single-Modality Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16617/) (2026)
- [Auditing Proprietary Alignment in Large Language Models: A Comparative Framework Without a Ground-Truth Standard](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.08381/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models on Multi-Sensor Physical Hazard Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20476/) (2026)
- [Context Staircase: Signature-Aligned Dynamics of Token Embeddings under Small Initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30315/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have generated significant attention since their inception, finding applications across various academic and industrial domains. However, these models often suffer from the "hallucination problem", where outputs, though grammatically and logically coherent, lack factual accuracy or are entirely fabricated. A particularly troubling issue discovered and widely discussed recently is the numerical comparison error where multiple LLMs incorrectly infer that "9.11>9.9". We discovered that the order in which LLMs generate answers and reasoning impacts their consistency. Specifically, results vary significantly when an LLM generates an answer first and then provides the reasoning versus generating the reasoning process first and then the conclusion. Inspired by this, we propose a new benchmark method for assessing LLM consistency: comparing responses generated through these two different approaches. This benchmark effectively identifies instances where LLMs fabricate answers and subsequently generate justifications. Furthermore, we introduce a novel and straightforward prompt strategy designed to mitigate this issue. Experimental results demonstrate that this strategy improves performance across various LLMs compared to direct questioning. This work not only sheds light on a critical flaw in LLMs but also offers a practical solution to enhance their reliability.
