# ConfReady: A RAG based Assistant and Dataset for Conference Checklist Responses

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04675 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04675/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07567/) (2021)
- [Show Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03004/) (2019)
- [Just What do You Think You're Doing, Dave?' A Checklist for Responsible Data Use in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.06598/) (2021)
- [Exploring the Impact of Table-to-Text Methods on Augmenting LLM-based Question Answering with Domain Hybrid Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12869/) (2024)
- [Reproducibility in NLP: What Have We Learned from the Checklist?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09562/) (2023)
- [A Decade of Information Architecture in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13412/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Is the ACL Responsible NLP Checklist a Box-Ticking Exercise? A Large-Scale Analysis of EMNLP 2025](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.09280/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The ARR Responsible NLP Research checklist website states that the "checklist is designed to encourage best practices for responsible research, addressing issues of research ethics, societal impact and reproducibility." Answering the questions is an opportunity for authors to reflect on their work and make sure any shared scientific assets follow best practices. Ideally, considering a checklist before submission can favorably impact the writing of a research paper. However, previous research has shown that self-reported checklist responses don't always accurately represent papers. In this work, we introduce ConfReady, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) application that can be used to empower authors to reflect on their work and assist authors with conference checklists. To evaluate checklist assistants, we curate a dataset of 1,975 ACL checklist responses, analyze problems in human answers, and benchmark RAG and Large Language Model (LM) based systems on an evaluation subset. Our code is released under the AGPL-3.0 license on GitHub, with documentation covering the user interface and PyPI package.
