# Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Breaks Sample Size Barriers in Linear MDPs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04526 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04526/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Offline RL algorithms, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Offline RL algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/offline-rl-algorithms/)
- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL theory and sample complexity](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-theory-and-sample-complexity/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.01643/) (2020)
- [AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09359/) (2020)
- [Provably Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05388/) (2019)
- [Minimax Regret Bounds for Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05449/) (2017)
- [Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03765/) (2018)
- [Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15085/) (2020)
- [Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02948/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08817/) (2017)
- [Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06926/) (2021)
- [Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05479/) (2023)
- [Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00815/) (2021)
- [A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.00137/) (2019)
- [Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08507/) (2020)
- [Hybrid RL: Using Both Offline and Online Data Can Make RL Efficient](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06718/) (2022)
- [Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04895/) (2021)
- [Is a Good Representation Sufficient for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03016/) (2019)
- [Learning with Good Feature Representations in Bandits and in RL with a Generative Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07676/) (2019)
- [Offline Reinforcement Learning with Realizability and Single-policy Concentrability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04634/) (2022)
- [Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09516/) (2020)
- [Provable Benefits of Actor-Critic Methods for Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.08812/) (2021)
- [Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05275/) (2022)
- [The Role of Coverage in Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04157/) (2022)
- [Near-optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representation: Leveraging Variance Information with Pessimism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05804/) (2022)
- [Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Markov Decision Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06132/) (2022)
- [Nearly Minimax Optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: Single-Agent MDP and Markov Game](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15512/) (2022)
- [Computationally Efficient Horizon-Free Reinforcement Learning for Linear Mixture MDPs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11507/) (2022)
- [Settling the Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13586/) (2023)
- [VOQL: Towards Optimal Regret in Model-free RL with Nonlinear Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06069/) (2022)
- [Leveraging Offline Data in Online Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04974/) (2022)
- [First-Order Regret in Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation: A Robust Estimation Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03432/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Hybrid Preference Optimization for Alignment: Provably Faster Convergence Rates by Combining Offline Preferences with Online Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10616/) (2024)
- [SIMPLEMIX: Frustratingly Simple Mixing of Off- and On-policy Data in Language Model Preference Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02363/) (2025)
- [Augmenting Online RL with Offline Data is All You Need: A Unified Hybrid RL Algorithm Design and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13768/) (2025)
- [Interactive and Hybrid Imitation Learning: Provably Beating Behavior Cloning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07057/) (2024)
- [Statistical and Algorithmic Foundations of Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14444/) (2025)
- [Provably Efficient Offline-to-Online Value Adaptation with General Function Approximation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13966/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hybrid Reinforcement Learning (RL), where an agent learns from both an offline dataset and online explorations in an unknown environment, has garnered significant recent interest. A crucial question posed by Xie et al. (2022) is whether hybrid RL can improve upon the existing lower bounds established in purely offline and purely online RL without relying on the single-policy concentrability assumption. While Li et al. (2023) provided an affirmative answer to this question in the tabular PAC RL case, the question remains unsettled for both the regret-minimizing RL case and the non-tabular case. In this work, building upon recent advancements in offline RL and reward-agnostic exploration, we develop computationally efficient algorithms for both PAC and regret-minimizing RL with linear function approximation, without single-policy concentrability. We demonstrate that these algorithms achieve sharper error or regret bounds that are no worse than, and can improve on, the optimal sample complexity in offline RL (the first algorithm, for PAC RL) and online RL (the second algorithm, for regret-minimizing RL) in linear Markov decision processes (MDPs), regardless of the quality of the behavior policy. To our knowledge, this work establishes the tightest theoretical guarantees currently available for hybrid RL in linear MDPs.