# Semantics or spelling? Probing contextual word embeddings with orthographic noise

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04162 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.04162/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1301.3781/) (2013)
- [Pointer Sentinel Mixture Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.07843/) (2016)
- [Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07909/) (2015)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03771/) (2019)
- [SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.06226/) (2018)
- [How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.00512/) (2019)
- [ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13626/) (2021)
- [CANINE: Pre-training an Efficient Tokenization-Free Encoder for Language Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06874/) (2021)
- [BPE-Dropout: Simple and Effective Subword Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13267/) (2019)
- [Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03955/) (2020)
- [Charformer: Fast Character Transformers via Gradient-based Subword Tokenization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12672/) (2021)
- [All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04404/) (2021)
- [Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10508/) (2021)
- [BERT Busters: Outlier Dimensions that Disrupt Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.06990/) (2021)
- [Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01509/) (2019)
- [Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05092/) (2022)
- [Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07790/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Tokenization is Sensitive to Language Variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15343/) (2025)
- [Learning to Look at the Other Side: A Semantic Probing Study of Word Embeddings in LLMs with Enabled Bidirectional Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01652/) (2025)
- [DiFA: Dual Evidence Fusion and Aggregation for Token-Level Text Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.22136/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Pretrained language model (PLM) hidden states are frequently employed as contextual word embeddings (CWE): high-dimensional representations that encode semantic information given linguistic context. Across many areas of computational linguistics research, similarity between CWEs is interpreted as semantic similarity. However, it remains unclear exactly what information is encoded in PLM hidden states. We investigate this practice by probing PLM representations using minimal orthographic noise. We expect that if CWEs primarily encode semantic information, a single character swap in the input word will not drastically affect the resulting representation,given sufficient linguistic context. Surprisingly, we find that CWEs generated by popular PLMs are highly sensitive to noise in input data, and that this sensitivity is related to subword tokenization: the fewer tokens used to represent a word at input, the more sensitive its corresponding CWE. This suggests that CWEs capture information unrelated to word-level meaning and can be manipulated through trivial modifications of input data. We conclude that these PLM-derived CWEs may not be reliable semantic proxies, and that caution is warranted when interpreting representational similarity