# MAO: A Framework for Process Model Generation with Multi-Agent Orchestration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01916 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01916/

## Key facts

- Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 29 of its 79 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 29 of 29)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16291/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.07814/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05638/) (2022)
- [CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13474/) (2022)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06435/) (2023)
- [AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10848/) (2023)
- [Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02124/) (2023)
- [Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.15710/) (2023)
- [Language Models in the Loop: Incorporating Prompting into Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.02318/) (2022)
- [FlowMind: Automatic Workflow Generation with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13050/) (2024)
- [ProAgent: From Robotic Process Automation to Agentic Process Automation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10751/) (2023)
- [Process Modeling With Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07541/) (2024)
- [Just Tell Me: Prompt Engineering in Business Process Management](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07183/) (2023)
- [An Approach for Process Model Extraction By Multi-Grained Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02127/) (2019)
- [Robotic Process Automation -- A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.11951/) (2020)
- [Process Discovery Using Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05835/) (2021)
- [TAGA: Text-Attributed Graph Self-Supervised Learning by Synergizing Graph and Text Mutual Transformations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16800/) (2024)
- [Petri Net Based Symbolic Model Checking for Computation Tree Logic of Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10126/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [A Survey on LLM-based Multi-Agent System: Recent Advances and New Frontiers in Application](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17481/) (2024)
- [Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21206/) (2025)
- [BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13787/) (2025)
- [Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05986/) (2025)
- [PlanTwin: Privacy-Preserving Planning Abstractions for Cloud-Assisted LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18377/) (2026)
- [Experience as a Compass: Multi-agent RAG with Evolving Orchestration and Agent Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.00901/) (2026)
- [Agentic Designer: Progressive Multi-Agent Collaboration for Structure-Aware Interior Layout Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.20866/) (2026)
- [Beyond Control-Flow: Integrating the Resource Perspective into Multi-Collaborative Process Modeling from Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24546/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Process models are frequently used in software engineering to describe business requirements, guide software testing and control system improvement. However, traditional process modeling methods often require the participation of numerous experts, which is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, the exploration of a more efficient and cost-effective automated modeling method has emerged as a focal point in current research. This article explores a framework for automatically generating process models with multi-agent orchestration (MAO), aiming to enhance the efficiency of process modeling and offer valuable insights for domain experts. Our framework MAO leverages large language models as the cornerstone for multi-agent, employing an innovative prompt strategy to ensure efficient collaboration among multi-agent. Specifically, 1) generation. The first phase of MAO is to generate a slightly rough process model from the text description; 2) refinement. The agents would continuously refine the initial process model through multiple rounds of dialogue; 3) reviewing. Large language models are prone to hallucination phenomena among multi-turn dialogues, so the agents need to review and repair semantic hallucinations in process models; 4) testing. The representation of process models is diverse. Consequently, the agents utilize external tools to test whether the generated process model contains format errors, namely format hallucinations, and then adjust the process model to conform to the output paradigm. The experiments demonstrate that the process models generated by our framework outperform existing methods and surpass manual modeling by 89%, 61%, 52%, and 75% on four different datasets, respectively.