# Evaluating Long Range Dependency Handling in Code Generation LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21049 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21049/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14135/) (2022)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.10509/) (2019)
- [GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13245/) (2023)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14848/) (2024)
- [Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04623/) (2018)
- [Repository-Level Prompt Generation for Large Language Models of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12839/) (2022)
- [Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02900/) (2019)
- [LV-Eval: A Balanced Long-Context Benchmark with 5 Length Levels Up to 256K](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05136/) (2024)
- [Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.12106/) (2019)
- [In Search of Needles in a 11M Haystack: Recurrent Memory Finds What LLMs Miss](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10790/) (2024)
- [Pointer Value Retrieval: A new benchmark for understanding the limits of neural network generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.12580/) (2021)
- [Adaptivity and Modularity for Efficient Generalization Over Task Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08866/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As language models support larger and larger context sizes, evaluating their ability to make effective use of that context becomes increasingly important. We analyze the ability of several code generation models to handle long range dependencies using a suite of multi-step key retrieval tasks in context windows up to 8k tokens in length. The tasks progressively increase in difficulty and allow more nuanced evaluation of model capabilities than tests like the popular needle-in-the-haystack test. We find that performance degrades significantly for many models (up to 2x) when a function references another function that is defined later in the prompt. We also observe that models that use sliding window attention mechanisms have difficulty handling references further than the size of a single window. We perform simple prompt modifications using call graph information to improve multi-step retrieval performance up to 3x. Our analysis highlights ways that long-context performance needs deeper consideration beyond retrieval of single facts within a document.