# Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20859 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.20859/

## Key facts

- Cited by 81 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 40 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agent threats, guardrails and governance](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agent-threats-guardrails-and-governance/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15043/) (2023)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08419/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07125/) (2019)
- [A Survey on In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00234/) (2022)
- [Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06131/) (2017)
- [GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10253/) (2023)
- [Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15817/) (2023)
- [InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02691/) (2024)
- [DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11698/) (2023)
- [Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13860/) (2023)
- ["Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03825/) (2023)
- [Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06987/) (2023)
- [TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05271/) (2018)
- [A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.05922/) (2023)
- [Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05197/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.06059/) (2018)
- [Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13733/) (2021)
- [Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16888/) (2023)
- [What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09731/) (2023)
- [Watch Out for Your Agents! Investigating Backdoor Threats to LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11208/) (2024)
- [Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.11508/) (2019)
- [Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12867/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 81)

- [AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09024/) (2024)
- [AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18666/) (2025)
- [ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22738/) (2025)
- [Adaptive Attacks Break Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00061/) (2025)
- [Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14847/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey in LLM(-Agent) Full Stack Safety: Data, Training and Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15585/) (2025)
- [TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08638/) (2025)
- [Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13172/) (2025)
- [Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05206/) (2025)
- [TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04133/) (2025)
- [A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19676/) (2025)
- [Taming Various Privilege Escalation in LLM-Based Agent Systems: A Mandatory Access Control Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11893/) (2026)
- [Multi-Agent Systems Execute Arbitrary Malicious Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12188/) (2025)
- [Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08586/) (2025)
- [Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19443/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23844/) (2025)
- [Free-MAD: Consensus-Free Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11035/) (2025)
- [Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23883/) (2025)
- [We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13666/) (2025)
- [Large Model Based Agents: State-of-the-Art, Cooperation Paradigms, Security and Privacy, and Future Trends](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14457/) (2024)
- ["Humans welcome to observe": A First Look at the Agent Social Network Moltbook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10127/) (2026)
- [Attractive Metadata Attack: Inducing LLM Agents to Invoke Malicious Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02110/) (2025)
- [AgentMisalignment: Measuring the Propensity for Misaligned Behaviour in LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04018/) (2025)
- [CORBA: Contagious Recursive Blocking Attacks on Multi-Agent Systems Based on Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14529/) (2025)
- [From Storage to Steering: Memory Control Flow Attacks on LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15125/) (2026)
- [Security of Internet of Agents: Attacks and Countermeasures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08807/) (2025)
- [AgentWorm: Self-Propagating Attacks Across LLM Agent Ecosystems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15727/) (2026)
- [MermaidFlow: Redefining Agentic Workflow Generation via Safety-Constrained Evolutionary Programming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22967/) (2025)
- [SafeScientist: Toward Risk-Aware Scientific Discoveries by LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23559/) (2025)
- [A Framework for Formalizing LLM Agent Security](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19469/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, autonomous agents built on large language models (LLMs) have experienced significant development and are being deployed in real-world applications. These agents can extend the base LLM's capabilities in multiple ways. For example, a well-built agent using GPT-3.5-Turbo as its core can outperform the more advanced GPT-4 model by leveraging external components. More importantly, the usage of tools enables these systems to perform actions in the real world, moving from merely generating text to actively interacting with their environment. Given the agents' practical applications and their ability to execute consequential actions, it is crucial to assess potential vulnerabilities. Such autonomous systems can cause more severe damage than a standalone language model if compromised. While some existing research has explored harmful actions by LLM agents, our study approaches the vulnerability from a different perspective. We introduce a new type of attack that causes malfunctions by misleading the agent into executing repetitive or irrelevant actions. We conduct comprehensive evaluations using various attack methods, surfaces, and properties to pinpoint areas of susceptibility. Our experiments reveal that these attacks can induce failure rates exceeding 80% in multiple scenarios. Through attacks on implemented and deployable agents in multi-agent scenarios, we accentuate the realistic risks associated with these vulnerabilities. To mitigate such attacks, we propose self-examination detection methods. However, our findings indicate these attacks are difficult to detect effectively using LLMs alone, highlighting the substantial risks associated with this vulnerability.