# CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20564 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.20564/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 2 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10168/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05081/) (2025)
- [ComparisonQA: Evaluating Factuality Robustness of LLMs Through Knowledge Frequency Control and Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20251/) (2024)
- [Climplicit: Climatic Implicit Embeddings for Global Ecological Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05089/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Transformers for Generalizable First-Order Logical Entailment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.00759/) (2025)
- [KG-LLM-Bench: A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Reasoning on Textualized Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07087/) (2025)
- [KnowShiftQA: How Robust are RAG Systems when Textbook Knowledge Shifts in K-12 Education?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.08985/) (2024)
- [Inference Scaled GraphRAG: Improving Multi Hop Question Answering on Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19967/) (2025)
- [Efficient and Scalable Neural Symbolic Search for Knowledge Graph Complex Query Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08155/) (2025)
- [Neural Scalable Symbolic Search Framework for Complex Logical Queries with Multiple Free Variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25985/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks by acquiring rich factual knowledge from their broad training data, their ability to synthesize and logically reason with this knowledge in complex ways remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs' complex logical reasoning abilities through a novel benchmark of automatically generated complex reasoning questions over general domain and biomedical knowledge graphs. Our extensive experiments, employing diverse in-context learning techniques, reveal that LLMs excel at reasoning over general world knowledge but face significant challenges with specialized domain-specific knowledge. We find that prompting with explicit Chain-of-Thought demonstrations can substantially improve LLM performance on complex logical reasoning tasks with diverse logical operations. Interestingly, our controlled evaluations uncover an asymmetry where LLMs display proficiency at set union operations, but struggle considerably with set intersections - a key building block of logical reasoning. To foster further work, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark and code.
