# Evaluating Large Language Models for automatic analysis of teacher simulations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20360 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.20360/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09543/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03109/) (2023)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01243/) (2021)
- [Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.16061/) (2020)
- [The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09720/) (2022)
- [Natural Language Processing: State of The Art, Current Trends and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05148/) (2017)
- [Practical and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models in Education: A Systematic Scoping Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13379/) (2023)
- [Generative Pre-trained Transformer: A Comprehensive Review on Enabling Technologies, Potential Applications, Emerging Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10435/) (2023)
- [Insights into Performance Fitness and Error Metrics for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.00887/) (2020)
- [Enhanced Automated Code Vulnerability Repair using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03741/) (2024)
- [GPTutor: Great Personalized Tutor with Large Language Models for Personalized Learning Content Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09484/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Digital Simulations (DS) provide safe environments where users interact with an agent through conversational prompts, providing engaging learning experiences that can be used to train teacher candidates in realistic classroom scenarios. These simulations usually include open-ended questions, allowing teacher candidates to express their thoughts but complicating an automatic response analysis. To address this issue, we have evaluated Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify characteristics (user behaviors) in the responses of DS for teacher education. We evaluated the performance of DeBERTaV3 and Llama 3, combined with zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning. Our experiments discovered a significant variation in the LLMs' performance depending on the characteristic to identify. Similar variations also occurred in Phi-4-mini and Qwen-3. Additionally, we noted that DeBERTaV3 significantly reduced its performance when it had to identify new characteristics. In contrast, Llama 3 performed better than DeBERTaV3 in detecting new characteristics and showing more stable performance. Therefore, in DS where teacher educators need to introduce new characteristics because they change depending on the simulation or the educational objectives, it is more recommended to use Llama 3. These results can guide other researchers in introducing LLMs to provide automatic evaluations in DS.