# Visual Riddles: a Commonsense and World Knowledge Challenge for Large Vision and Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19474 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19474/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 70 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.01952/) (2023)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12966/) (2023)
- [OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00067/) (2019)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01718/) (2022)
- [From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10830/) (2018)
- [BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12390/) (2024)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09525/) (2021)
- [DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11794/) (2024)
- [LCM-LoRA: A Universal Stable-Diffusion Acceleration Module](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05556/) (2023)
- [Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08202/) (2021)
- [DOCCI: Descriptions of Connected and Contrasting Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19753/) (2024)
- [CommonsenseQA 2.0: Exposing the Limits of AI through Gamification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05320/) (2022)
- [What You See is What You Read? Improving Text-Image Alignment Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10400/) (2023)
- [VisIT-Bench: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Instruction Following Inspired by Real-World Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06595/) (2023)
- [Do Androids Laugh at Electric Sheep? Humor "Understanding" Benchmarks from The New Yorker Caption Contest](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06293/) (2022)
- [MileBench: Benchmarking MLLMs in Long Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18532/) (2024)
- [Breaking Common Sense: WHOOPS! A Vision-and-Language Benchmark of Synthetic and Compositional Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07274/) (2023)
- [A Chain-of-Thought Is as Strong as Its Weakest Link: A Benchmark for Verifiers of Reasoning Chains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00559/) (2024)
- [The Abduction of Sherlock Holmes: A Dataset for Visual Abductive Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04800/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [ZeroBench: An Impossible Visual Benchmark for Contemporary Large Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09696/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07869/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Causal Reasoning Benchmark: Challenging Vision Large Language Models to Discern Causal Links Across Modalities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08105/) (2024)
- [NL-Eye: Abductive NLI for Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02613/) (2024)
- [RefVNLI: Towards Scalable Evaluation of Subject-driven Text-to-image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17502/) (2025)
- [Visual Graph Arena: Evaluating Visual Conceptualization of Vision and Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06242/) (2025)
- [MM-OPERA: Benchmarking Open-ended Association Reasoning for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26937/) (2025)
- [Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.15557/) (2026)
- [Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.22933/) (2025)
- [Understanding Space Is Rocket Science -- Only Top Reasoning Models Can Solve Spatial Understanding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02175/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Imagine observing someone scratching their arm; to understand why, additional context would be necessary. However, spotting a mosquito nearby would immediately offer a likely explanation for the person's discomfort, thereby alleviating the need for further information. This example illustrates how subtle visual cues can challenge our cognitive skills and demonstrates the complexity of interpreting visual scenarios. To study these skills, we present Visual Riddles, a benchmark aimed to test vision and language models on visual riddles requiring commonsense and world knowledge. The benchmark comprises 400 visual riddles, each featuring a unique image created by a variety of text-to-image models, question, ground-truth answer, textual hint, and attribution. Human evaluation reveals that existing models lag significantly behind human performance, which is at 82% accuracy, with Gemini-Pro-1.5 leading with 40% accuracy. Our benchmark comes with automatic evaluation tasks to make assessment scalable. These findings underscore the potential of Visual Riddles as a valuable resource for enhancing vision and language models' capabilities in interpreting complex visual scenarios.