# Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in Multimodal Misinformation Detection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19192 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19192/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.01286/) (2018)
- [Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04096/) (2018)
- [MVSS-Net: Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervised Networks for Image Manipulation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08935/) (2021)
- [Image Manipulation Detection by Multi-View Multi-Scale Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06832/) (2021)
- [Exploiting Multi-domain Visual Information for Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04472/) (2019)
- [Improving Fake News Detection by Using an Entity-enhanced Framework to Fuse Diverse Multimodal Clues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.10509/) (2021)
- [Self-PU: Self Boosted and Calibrated Positive-Unlabeled Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11280/) (2020)
- [FReTAL: Generalizing Deepfake Detection using Knowledge Distillation and Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.13617/) (2021)
- [Generalizing to the Future: Mitigating Entity Bias in Fake News Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.09484/) (2022)
- [Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.02801/) (2022)
- [Classification from Positive, Unlabeled and Biased Negative Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00846/) (2018)
- [Combating Online Misinformation Videos: Characterization, Detection, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03242/) (2023)
- [MixPUL: Consistency-based Augmentation for Positive and Unlabeled Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09388/) (2020)
- [Bridging the Gap between Decision and Logits in Decision-based Knowledge Distillation for Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08909/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Collaboration and Controversy Among Experts: Rumor Early Detection by Tuning a Comment Generator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04076/) (2025)
- [Robust Misinformation Detection by Visiting Potential Commonsense Conflict](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21604/) (2025)
- [Remember Past, Anticipate Future: Learning Continual Multimodal Misinformation Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05939/) (2025)
- [Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: A Task-Directed Survey in the Black-Box Models Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03177/) (2026)
- [Dataset of News Articles with Provenance Metadata for Media Relevance Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09847/) (2025)
- [Variety Is the Spice of Life: Detecting Misinformation with Dynamic Environmental Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03420/) (2025)
- [Harmful Visual Content Manipulation Matters in Misinformation Detection Under Multimedia Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21054/) (2026)
- [Off-the-shelf Vision Models Benefit Image Manipulation Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09096/) (2026)
- [Latent Causal Void: Explicit Missing-Context Reconstruction for Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12156/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Nowadays, misinformation is widely spreading over various social media platforms and causes extremely negative impacts on society. To combat this issue, automatically identifying misinformation, especially those containing multimodal content, has attracted growing attention from the academic and industrial communities, and induced an active research topic named Multimodal Misinformation Detection (MMD). Typically, existing MMD methods capture the semantic correlation and inconsistency between multiple modalities, but neglect some potential clues in multimodal content. Recent studies suggest that manipulated traces of the images in articles are non-trivial clues for detecting misinformation. Meanwhile, we find that the underlying intentions behind the manipulation, e.g., harmful and harmless, also matter in MMD. Accordingly, in this work, we propose to detect misinformation by learning manipulation features that indicate whether the image has been manipulated, as well as intention features regarding the harmful and harmless intentions of the manipulation. Unfortunately, the manipulation and intention labels that make these features discriminative are unknown. To overcome the problem, we propose two weakly supervised signals as alternatives by introducing additional datasets on image manipulation detection and formulating two classification tasks as positive and unlabeled learning problems. Based on these ideas, we propose a novel MMD method, namely Harmfully Manipulated Images Matter in MMD (HAMI-M3D). Extensive experiments across three benchmark datasets can demonstrate that HAMI-M3D can consistently improve the performance of any MMD baselines.
