# Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19041 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19041/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 39 of its 81 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Scaling Language Models: Methods, Analysis & Insights from Training Gopher](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11446/) (2021)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [GLaM: Efficient Scaling of Language Models with Mixture-of-Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06905/) (2021)
- [It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07118/) (2020)
- [Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07350/) (2021)
- [Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02059/) (2019)
- [CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02478/) (2018)
- [How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.12158/) (2020)
- [JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12011/) (2019)
- [Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09168/) (2017)
- [DeepOpht: Medical Report Generation for Retinal Images via Deep Models and Visual Explanation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00569/) (2020)
- [Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08504/) (2018)
- [Charge-Based Prison Term Prediction with Deep Gating Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11521/) (2019)
- [CAIL2019-SCM: A Dataset of Similar Case Matching in Legal Domain](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08962/) (2019)
- [Plain English Summarization of Contracts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00424/) (2019)
- [CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09156/) (2019)
- [GPT2MVS: Generative Pre-trained Transformer-2 for Multi-modal Video Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12465/) (2021)
- [Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.14083/) (2020)
- [A Novel Framework for Robustness Analysis of Visual QA Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.06232/) (2017)
- [VQABQ: Visual Question Answering by Basic Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06492/) (2017)
- [Robustness Analysis of Visual QA Models by Basic Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.04625/) (2017)
- [Assessing the Robustness of Visual Question Answering Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01452/) (2019)
- [Towards Fine-Grained Citation Evaluation in Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis of Faithfulness Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15264/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21306/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09969/) (2025)
- [Exploring Possibilities of AI-Powered Legal Assistance in Bangladesh through Large Language Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17210/) (2024)
- [Mina: A Multilingual LLM-Powered Legal Assistant Agent for Bangladesh for Empowering Access to Justice](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08605/) (2025)
- [Active Imitation Learning for Thermal- and Kernel-Aware LFM Inference on 3D S-NUCA Many-Cores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.11948/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The legal landscape encompasses a wide array of lawsuit types, presenting lawyers with challenges in delivering timely and accurate information to clients, particularly concerning critical aspects like potential imprisonment duration or financial repercussions. Compounded by the scarcity of legal experts, there's an urgent need to enhance the efficiency of traditional legal workflows. Recent advances in deep learning, especially Large Language Models (LLMs), offer promising solutions to this challenge. Leveraging LLMs' mathematical reasoning capabilities, we propose a novel approach integrating LLM-based methodologies with specially designed prompts to address precision requirements in legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) applications. The proposed work seeks to bridge the gap between traditional legal practices and modern technological advancements, paving the way for a more accessible, efficient, and equitable legal system. To validate this method, we introduce a curated dataset tailored to precision-oriented LegalAI tasks, serving as a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based approaches. Extensive experimentation confirms the efficacy of our methodology in generating accurate numerical estimates within the legal domain, emphasizing the role of LLMs in streamlining legal processes and meeting the evolving demands of LegalAI.