# Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16711 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16711/

## Key facts

- Cited by 35 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 83 of its 137 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 83)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.05326/) (2015)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04132/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17926/) (2023)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07201/) (2023)
- [Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01937/) (2023)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08411/) (2022)
- [TIFA: Accurate and Interpretable Text-to-Image Faithfulness Evaluation with Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11897/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14520/) (2023)
- [The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12288/) (2023)
- [QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06378/) (2021)
- [AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15366/) (2021)
- [Are we done with ImageNet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07159/) (2020)
- [tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14992/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17385/) (2024)
- [Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14127/) (2025)
- [Toward an Evaluation Science for Generative AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05336/) (2025)
- [Fluid Language Model Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11106/) (2025)
- [When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16763/) (2026)
- [EvalTree: Profiling Language Model Weaknesses via Hierarchical Capability Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08893/) (2025)
- [IssueBench: Millions of Realistic Prompts for Measuring Issue Bias in LLM Writing Assistance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08395/) (2025)
- [Do Vision-Language Models Have Internal World Models? Towards an Atomic Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21876/) (2025)
- [Improving Model Evaluation using SMART Filtering of Benchmark Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20245/) (2024)
- [ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06745/) (2024)
- [Culture is Everywhere: A Call for Intentionally Cultural Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01301/) (2025)
- [How Reliable is Language Model Micro-Benchmarking?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.08730/) (2025)
- [Vision-Language Models Are Not Pragmatically Competent in Referring Expression Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16060/) (2025)
- [A Good Plan is Hard to Find: Aligning Models with Preferences is Misaligned with What Helps Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18632/) (2025)
- [Toward a Theory of Generalizability in LLM Mechanistic Interpretability Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22831/) (2025)
- [BenchMarker: An Education-Inspired Toolkit for Highlighting Flaws in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06221/) (2026)
- [Emergence WebVoyager: Toward Consistent and Transparent Evaluation of (Web) Agents in The Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29020/) (2026)
- [Societal Impacts Research Requires Benchmarks for Creative Composition Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06549/) (2025)
- [Benchmarks Are Not Atomic: Composition-Aware LLM Evaluation using BenchHub](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00482/) (2025)
- [Can Models Help Us Create Better Models? Evaluating LLMs as Data Scientists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23331/) (2024)
- [Language Models Don't Know What You Want: Evaluating Personalization in Deep Research Needs Real Users](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16120/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models for Fair and Reliable Organ Allocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03716/) (2025)
- [Can They Dixit? Yes they Can! Dixit as a Playground for Multimodal Language Model Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19892/) (2025)
- [The Differential Meaning of Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Structural Consequences of Semantic Modeling Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00248/) (2025)
- [Towards Real-World Validity in Generative AI Benchmarks: Understanding and Designing Domain-Centered Evaluations for Journalism Practitioners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05501/) (2025)
- [Aligning Language Model Benchmarks with Pairwise Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02898/) (2026)
- [Correcting test set contamination by spiking the training data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.24818/) (2026)
- [Developmental Trajectories of Situation Modeling and Mentalizing in Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.28524/) (2026)
- [EvalSafetyGap: A Hybrid Survey and Conceptual Framework for LLM Evaluation-Safety Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.30219/) (2026)
- [Optimization Is Not All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.11977/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. Static benchmarks inevitably saturate without providing confidence in the deployment tolerances of LM-based systems, but developers nonetheless claim that their models have generalized traits such as reasoning or open-domain language understanding based on these flawed metrics. The science and practice of LMs requires a new approach to benchmarking which measures specific capabilities with dynamic assessments. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology -- one which focuses on how to generate benchmarks that predict performance under deployment. Motivated by our evaluation criteria, we outline how building a community of model metrology practitioners -- one focused on building tools and studying how to measure system capabilities -- is the best way to meet these needs to and add clarity to the AI discussion.