# Boosting Reward Model with Preference-Conditional Multi-Aspect Synthetic Data Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16008 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16008/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation.
- Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Reward modeling and RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/reward-modeling-and-rlhf/)
- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-rewarding alignment and self-training](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-rewarding-alignment-and-self-training/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08295/) (2024)
- [Instruction Tuning with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03277/) (2023)
- [RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tears](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05302/) (2023)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09689/) (2022)
- [Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06452/) (2023)
- [Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06657/) (2023)
- [Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03047/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15895/) (2023)
- [ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07922/) (2022)
- [Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.04538/) (2022)
- [Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07503/) (2024)
- [Synthetic Data (Almost) from Scratch: Generalized Instruction Tuning for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13064/) (2024)
- [Aligning Large Language Models through Synthetic Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13735/) (2023)
- [Synthetic Prompting: Generating Chain-of-Thought Demonstrations for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00618/) (2023)
- [Models of human preference for learning reward functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02231/) (2022)
- [Content preserving text generation with attribute controls](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.01135/) (2018)
- [RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.12950/) (2023)
- [Better Synthetic Data by Retrieving and Transforming Existing Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14361/) (2024)
- [Attribute Alignment: Controlling Text Generation from Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11070/) (2021)
- [ReGen: Zero-Shot Text Classification via Training Data Generation with Progressive Dense Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10703/) (2023)
- [On the Sensitivity of Reward Inference to Misspecified Human Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04717/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.07743/) (2025)
- [RRM: Robust Reward Model Training Mitigates Reward Hacking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13156/) (2024)
- [Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16646/) (2024)
- [Robust Reward Modeling via Causal Rubrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.16507/) (2025)
- [Incentivizing Agentic Reasoning in LLM Judges via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23038/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Reward Over-Optimization in RLHF via Behavior-Supported Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18130/) (2025)
- [Mitigating Sycophancy in Decoder-Only Transformer Architectures: Synthetic Data Intervention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10156/) (2024)
- [Learning a Pessimistic Reward Model in RLHF](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20556/) (2025)
- [Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00754/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reward models (RMs) are crucial for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. They are trained using preference datasets where each example consists of one input prompt, two responses, and a preference label. As curating a high-quality human labeled preference dataset is both time-consuming and expensive, people often rely on existing powerful LLMs for preference label generation. This can potentially introduce noise and impede RM training. In this work, we present RMBoost, a novel synthetic preference data generation paradigm to boost reward model quality. Unlike traditional methods, which generate two responses before obtaining the preference label, RMBoost first generates one response and selects a preference label, followed by generating the second more (or less) preferred response conditioned on the pre-selected preference label and the first response. This approach offers two main advantages. First, RMBoost reduces labeling noise since preference pairs are constructed intentionally. Second, RMBoost facilitates the creation of more diverse responses by incorporating various quality aspects (e.g., helpfulness, relevance, completeness) into the prompts. We conduct extensive experiments across three diverse datasets and demonstrate that RMBoost outperforms other synthetic preference data generation techniques and significantly boosts the performance of four distinct reward models.