# How to Train Your Multi-Exit Model? Analyzing the Impact of Training Strategies

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14320 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.14320/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00298/) (2021)
- [Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09913/) (2017)
- [BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.01686/) (2017)
- [BERT Loses Patience: Fast and Robust Inference with Early Exit](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04152/) (2020)
- [Resolution Adaptive Networks for Efficient Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.07326/) (2020)
- [How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18887/) (2023)
- [Conditional Deep Learning for Energy-Efficient and Enhanced Pattern Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.08971/) (2015)
- [Improved Techniques for Training Adaptive Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06294/) (2019)
- [Fixing Overconfidence in Dynamic Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06359/) (2023)
- [Boosted Dynamic Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16726/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Adaptive Semantic Token Communication for Transformer-based Edge Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17604/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Early exits enable the network's forward pass to terminate early by attaching trainable internal classifiers to the backbone network. Existing early-exit methods typically adopt either a joint training approach, where the backbone and exit heads are trained simultaneously, or a disjoint approach, where the heads are trained separately. However, the implications of this choice are often overlooked, with studies typically adopting one approach without adequate justification. This choice influences training dynamics and its impact remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce a set of metrics to analyze early-exit training dynamics and guide the choice of training strategy. We demonstrate that conventionally used joint and disjoint regimes yield suboptimal performance. To address these limitations, we propose a mixed training strategy: the backbone is trained first, followed by the training of the entire multi-exit network. Through comprehensive evaluations of training strategies across various architectures, datasets, and early-exit methods, we present the strengths and weaknesses of the early exit training strategies. In particular, we show consistent improvements in performance and efficiency using the proposed mixed strategy.
