# FSP-Laplace: Function-Space Priors for the Laplace Approximation in Bayesian Deep Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13711 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.13711/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01768/) (2018)
- [New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1193/) (2014)
- [Gaussian Processes for Big Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1309.6835/) (2013)
- [Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.02582/) (2018)
- [Practical Deep Learning with Bayesian Principles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02506/) (2019)
- [Solving and Learning Nonlinear PDEs with Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12959/) (2021)
- [Functional Variational Bayesian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.05779/) (2019)
- [Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04975/) (2021)
- [Measuring and regularizing networks in function space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08289/) (2018)
- [Approximate Inference Turns Deep Networks into Gaussian Processes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.01930/) (2019)
- ['In-Between' Uncertainty in Bayesian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.11537/) (2019)
- [Generalized Variational Inference: Three arguments for deriving new Posteriors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02063/) (2019)
- [Uncertainty in Gradient Boosting via Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.10562/) (2020)
- [Bayesian Probabilistic Numerical Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.03673/) (2017)
- [Dirichlet-based Gaussian Processes for Large-scale Calibrated Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.10915/) (2018)
- [A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.20028/) (2023)
- [Physics-Informed Gaussian Process Regression Generalizes Linear PDE Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.12474/) (2022)
- [Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17199/) (2023)
- [Understanding Variational Inference in Function-Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09421/) (2020)
- [Accelerated Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.12642/) (2022)
- [Expressive Priors in Bayesian Neural Networks: Kernel Combinations and Periodic Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06076/) (2019)
- [Generalized Variational Inference in Function Spaces: Gaussian Measures meet Bayesian Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06342/) (2022)
- [The Ridgelet Prior: A Covariance Function Approach to Prior Specification for Bayesian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08488/) (2020)
- [Knowledge-Adaptation Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08769/) (2021)
- [Sampling-based inference for large linear models, with application to linearised Laplace](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.04994/) (2022)
- [Should We Learn Most Likely Functions or Parameters?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15990/) (2023)
- [Sample Path Regularity of Gaussian Processes from the Covariance Kernel](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.14886/) (2023)
- [Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10929/) (2024)
- [Gaussian Process Inference Using Mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent: Convergence Guarantees and Empirical Benefits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.10461/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Confidence Sequences for Generalized Linear Models via Regret Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.16555/) (2025)
- [laplax -- Laplace Approximations with JAX](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17013/) (2025)
- [Minimax optimality of deep neural networks on dependent data via PAC-Bayes bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21702/) (2024)
- [CLAPS: Aleatoric-Epistemic Scaling via Last-Layer Laplace for Conformal Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.01384/) (2025)
- [Tubular Riemannian Laplace Approximations for Bayesian Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.24381/) (2025)
- [Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Tensor Network Kernel Machines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26673/) (2026)
- [A Ground-Truth Framework for Uncertainty Disentanglement with Posterior Risk](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.05995/) (2026)
- [Variational Deep Learning via Implicit Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20235/) (2025)
- [Constructive Disintegration and Conditional Modes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.00617/) (2025)
- [Amortising Inference and Meta-Learning Priors in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08782/) (2026)
- [Self-Supervised Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12208/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Laplace approximations are popular techniques for endowing deep networks with epistemic uncertainty estimates as they can be applied without altering the predictions of the trained network, and they scale to large models and datasets. While the choice of prior strongly affects the resulting posterior distribution, computational tractability and lack of interpretability of the weight space typically limit the Laplace approximation to isotropic Gaussian priors, which are known to cause pathological behavior as depth increases. As a remedy, we directly place a prior on function space. More precisely, since Lebesgue densities do not exist on infinite-dimensional function spaces, we recast training as finding the so-called weak mode of the posterior measure under a Gaussian process (GP) prior restricted to the space of functions representable by the neural network. Through the GP prior, one can express structured and interpretable inductive biases, such as regularity or periodicity, directly in function space, while still exploiting the implicit inductive biases that allow deep networks to generalize. After model linearization, the training objective induces a negative log-posterior density to which we apply a Laplace approximation, leveraging highly scalable methods from matrix-free linear algebra. Our method provides improved results where prior knowledge is abundant (as is the case in many scientific inference tasks). At the same time, it stays competitive for black-box supervised learning problems, where neural networks typically excel.
