# A Framework For Discussing LLMs as Tools for Qualitative Analysis

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11198 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11198/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Computational KJ-Ho: An Analyst-Bias-Free Insight Extraction Framework from Large-Scale Qualitative Data Using Domain-Specialized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16467/) (2026)
- [How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11109/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We review discourses about the philosophy of science in qualitative research and evidence from cognitive linguistics in order to ground a framework for discussing the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) to support the qualitative analysis process. This framework involves asking two key questions: "is the LLM proposing or refuting a qualitative model?" and "is the human researcher checking the LLM's decision-making directly?". We then discuss an implication of this framework: that using LLMs to surface counter-examples for human review represents a promising space for the adoption of LLMs into the qualitative research process. This space is promising because it is a site of overlap between researchers working from a variety of philosophical assumptions, enabling productive cross-paradigm collaboration on tools and practices.