# Investigating the Interplay of Prioritized Replay and Generalization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09702 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09702/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2024.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Deep RL algorithms and representations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/deep-rl-algorithms-and-representations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Hindsight Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.01495/) (2017)
- [Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.05952/) (2015)
- [Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02298/) (2017)
- [Reinforcement Learning with Unsupervised Auxiliary Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05397/) (2016)
- [Distributed Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00933/) (2018)
- [Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06700/) (2020)
- [When to use parametric models in reinforcement learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05243/) (2019)
- [Synthetic Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06614/) (2023)
- [Sample-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Episodic Backward Update](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12375/) (2018)
- [A Generalized Projected Bellman Error for Off-policy Value Estimation in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.13844/) (2021)
- [Investigating the Properties of Neural Network Representations in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15955/) (2022)
- [Organizing Experience: A Deeper Look at Replay Mechanisms for Sample-based Planning in Continuous State Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.04624/) (2018)
- [Prediction and Control in Continual Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11669/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Prioritized Experience Replay: A Value Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.03261/) (2021)
- [Revisiting Experience Replayable Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10374/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Prioritized Replay for RL Post-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02648/) (2026)
- [Reliability-Adjusted Prioritized Experience Replay](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18482/) (2025)
- [Experience Replay with Random Reshuffling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02269/) (2025)
- [Value Bonuses using Ensemble Errors for Exploration in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12375/) (2026)
- [Endpoint Replay: Compressing the Recency Buffer in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.25123/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Experience replay, the reuse of past data to improve sample efficiency, is ubiquitous in reinforcement learning. Though a variety of smart sampling schemes have been introduced to improve performance, uniform sampling by far remains the most common approach. One exception is Prioritized Experience Replay (PER), where sampling is done proportionally to TD errors, inspired by the success of prioritized sweeping in dynamic programming. The original work on PER showed improvements in Atari, but follow-up results were mixed. In this paper, we investigate several variations on PER, to attempt to understand where and when PER may be useful. Our findings in prediction tasks reveal that while PER can improve value propagation in tabular settings, behavior is significantly different when combined with neural networks. Certain mitigations - like delaying target network updates to control generalization and using estimates of expected TD errors in PER to avoid chasing stochasticity - can avoid large spikes in error with PER and neural networks but generally do not outperform uniform replay. In control tasks, none of the prioritized variants consistently outperform uniform replay. We present new insight into the interaction between prioritization, bootstrapping, and neural networks and propose several improvements for PER in tabular settings and noisy domains.
