# Reshaping the Online Data Buffering and Organizing Mechanism for Continual Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09367 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09367/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 52 of its 71 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 52)

- [The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01685/) (2016)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.15203/) (2021)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.7495/) (2014)
- [WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07421/) (2020)
- [Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01754/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.02791/) (2015)
- [CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03213/) (2017)
- [Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08546/) (2020)
- [Domain Generalization: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02503/) (2021)
- [RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09670/) (2020)
- [Deep Transfer Learning with Joint Adaptation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06636/) (2016)
- [Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10349/) (2018)
- [FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05498/) (2020)
- [Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.13591/) (2022)
- [Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02610/) (2022)
- [Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.16971/) (2020)
- [Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12400/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.04779/) (2016)
- [Contrastive Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10377/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10956/) (2020)
- [Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.00712/) (2017)
- [Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05718/) (2022)
- [Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13899/) (2023)
- [SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.08737/) (2018)
- [Gradually Vanishing Bridge for Adversarial Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13183/) (2020)
- [EcoTTA: Memory-Efficient Continual Test-time Adaptation via Self-distilled Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01904/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Transforming Future Data Center Operations and Management via Physical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04982/) (2025)
- [APCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09971/) (2025)
- [PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02453/) (2025)
- [Instance-Aware Test-Time Segmentation for Continual Domain Shifts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08569/) (2025)
- [Distill Once, Adapt Life-Long: Exploring Dataset Distillation for Continual Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20196/) (2026)
- [Continual Test-Time Adaptation in Computer Vision: Methods, Benchmarks, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.08164/) (2026)
- [A Benchmark for Incremental Micro-expression Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19111/) (2025)
- [Learn Faster and Remember More: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation for Continual Test-time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12643/) (2025)
- [One Pool Is Not Enough: Multi-Cluster Memory for Practical Test-Time Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21135/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) involves adapting a pre-trained source model to continually changing unsupervised target domains. In this paper, we systematically analyze the challenges of this task: online environment, unsupervised nature, and the risks of error accumulation and catastrophic forgetting under continual domain shifts. To address these challenges, we reshape the online data buffering and organizing mechanism for CTTA. We propose an uncertainty-aware buffering approach to identify and aggregate significant samples with high certainty from the unsupervised, single-pass data stream. Based on this, we propose a graph-based class relation preservation constraint to overcome catastrophic forgetting. Furthermore, a pseudo-target replay objective is used to mitigate error accumulation. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method in both segmentation and classification CTTA tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/z1358/OBAO.