# A Taxonomy for Data Contamination in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08716 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08716/

## Key facts

- Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.05250/) (2016)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10964/) (2020)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.06023/) (2016)
- [Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05782/) (2023)
- [Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.06499/) (2021)
- [SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12237/) (2019)
- [Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08758/) (2021)
- [AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.15366/) (2021)
- [NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18018/) (2023)
- [Rethinking Benchmark and Contamination for Language Models with Rephrased Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04850/) (2023)
- [The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02301/) (2015)
- [Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymore](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16337/) (2023)
- [Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06059/) (2024)
- [Data Contamination Through the Lens of Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10628/) (2023)
- [The ROOTS Search Tool: Data Transparency for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14035/) (2023)
- [Data Portraits: Recording Foundation Model Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03919/) (2023)
- [Downstream Datasets Make Surprisingly Good Pretraining Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14389/) (2022)
- [Concerned with Data Contamination? Assessing Countermeasures in Code Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16898/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Oolong: Evaluating Long Context Reasoning and Aggregation Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.02817/) (2025)
- [Confusion is the Final Barrier: Rethinking Jailbreak Evaluation and Investigating the Real Misuse Threat of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16347/) (2025)
- [Re-evaluating Open-ended Evaluation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.20170/) (2025)
- [Policy Induction: Predicting Startup Success via Explainable Memory-Augmented In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21427/) (2025)
- [AdEval: Alignment-based Dynamic Evaluation to Mitigate Data Contamination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13983/) (2025)
- [LLM-AR: LLM-powered Automated Reasoning Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22034/) (2025)
- [Pretraining Data Exposure in Large Language Models: A Survey of Membership Inference, Data Contamination, and Security Implications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26133/) (2026)
- [How Much Reasoning Do Retrieval-Augmented Models Add beyond LLMs? A Benchmarking Framework for Multi-Hop Inference over Hybrid Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10210/) (2026)
- [Know2Guess: A Contamination-Aware Multi-Zone Benchmark for Knowledge-Boundary Evaluation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.26101/) (2026)
- [Benchmark Contamination: A Taxonomy Organized by Defeated Mitigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29463/) (2026)
- [Made in Hungary: Comments on the performance of generative language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18284/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models pretrained on extensive web corpora demonstrate remarkable performance across a wide range of downstream tasks. However, a growing concern is data contamination, where evaluation datasets may be contained in the pretraining corpus, inflating model performance. Decontamination, the process of detecting and removing such data, is a potential solution; yet these contaminants may originate from altered versions of the test set, evading detection during decontamination. How different types of contamination impact the performance of language models on downstream tasks is not fully understood. We present a taxonomy that categorizes the various types of contamination encountered by LLMs during the pretraining phase and identify which types pose the highest risk. We analyze the impact of contamination on two key NLP tasks -- summarization and question answering -- revealing how different types of contamination influence task performance during evaluation.
