# Rethinking the Threat and Accessibility of Adversarial Attacks against Face Recognition Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08514 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08514/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 83 of its 126 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 83)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Adversarial examples in the physical world](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.02533/) (2016)
- [Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08573/) (2019)
- [Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02918/) (2019)
- [DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04599/) (2015)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.07528/) (2015)
- [Universal adversarial perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.08401/) (2016)
- [Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.00049/) (2019)
- [ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03999/) (2017)
- [One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08864/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Patch](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.09665/) (2017)
- [Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08598/) (2018)
- [Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00553/) (2018)
- [HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02144/) (2019)
- [Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.03411/) (2018)
- [Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.02613/) (2018)
- [Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08653/) (2019)
- [Simple Black-box Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07121/) (2019)
- [DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.00179/) (2020)
- [Efficient Decision-based Black-box Adversarial Attacks on Face Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04433/) (2019)
- [Searching Central Difference Convolutional Networks for Face Anti-Spoofing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.04092/) (2020)
- [AdvHat: Real-world adversarial attack on ArcFace Face ID system](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08705/) (2019)
- [EAD: Elastic-Net Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.04114/) (2017)
- [Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks with Natural Styles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08757/) (2020)
- [Sign-OPT: A Query-Efficient Hard-label Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.10773/) (2019)
- [CelebA-Spoof: Large-Scale Face Anti-Spoofing Dataset with Rich Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12342/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Experimental robustness benchmarking of quantum neural networks on a superconducting quantum processor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16714/) (2025)
- [SoK: On the Survivability of Backdoor Attacks on Unconstrained Face Recognition Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01607/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Face recognition pipelines have been widely deployed in various mission-critical systems in trust, equitable and responsible AI applications. However, the emergence of adversarial attacks has threatened the security of the entire recognition pipeline. Despite the sheer number of attack methods proposed for crafting adversarial examples in both digital and physical forms, it is never an easy task to assess the real threat level of different attacks and obtain useful insight into the key risks confronted by face recognition systems. Traditional attacks view imperceptibility as the most important measurement to keep perturbations stealthy, while we suspect that industry professionals may possess a different opinion. In this paper, we delve into measuring the threat brought about by adversarial attacks from the perspectives of the industry and the applications of face recognition. In contrast to widely studied sophisticated attacks in the field, we propose an effective yet easy-to-launch physical adversarial attack, named AdvColor, against black-box face recognition pipelines in the physical world. AdvColor fools models in the recognition pipeline via directly supplying printed photos of human faces to the system under adversarial illuminations. Experimental results show that physical AdvColor examples can achieve a fooling rate of more than 96% against the anti-spoofing model and an overall attack success rate of 88% against the face recognition pipeline. We also conduct a survey on the threats of prevailing adversarial attacks, including AdvColor, to understand the gap between the machine-measured and human-assessed threat levels of different forms of adversarial attacks. The survey results surprisingly indicate that, compared to deliberately launched imperceptible attacks, perceptible but accessible attacks pose more lethal threats to real-world commercial systems of face recognition.